From: slider@anashram.com   
      
   On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 07:19:17 +0100, o'Mahoney    
   wrote:   
      
   > On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 02:56:49 +0100, slider    
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> We return now to an amazing and rather illuminating aspect of lucid   
   >> dreaming the WILD way, something which appears to be totally lacking in   
   >> DILDs but ever-present almost from the beginning with WILDs; the ability   
   >> to be in several places at once.    
   >>   
   >> Chapter 11. from: 'The WILD Way To Lucid Dreaming' (2016)   
   >   
   > Slider the issue you have here, at least with me, is that you tell   
   > great big fat porkies!   
   >   
   > The "160+" IQ which you posted in a total absence of shame or   
   > humility.  For instance.   
   >   
   > And there are others, the dope smoking stuff you posted and the stuff   
   > about tripping on mushies in Portugal or Spain or somewhere.   
   >   
   > BIg, fat porkies.   
   >   
   > So, for such an accomplished liar, how can any part of your book be   
   > accepted as truth on the face of it?  If you lie once, you can lie   
   > again.   
   >   
   > Just sayin'   
      
   ### - just ignorantly 'opining' ya mean heh :D   
      
   i.e., when scientists are confronted with a paper, they can 'opine' all   
   they want but in order for their 'opinion' to carry any weight what they   
   have to first ACTUALLY DO is attempt to honestly replicate/reproduce (iow:   
   peer review) the reported results OF that paper in order to verify/dispute   
   the stated results...   
      
   iow: without peer reviewing the data you can 'believe' anything ya want   
   and even SAY anything ya want, only THAT'S not science pal, in the   
   majority of cases that's just some opinionated/biased asshole stating his   
   whatever ignorant 'beliefs' without any legitimate foundation or basis   
   whatsoever heh :)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)