From: intraphase@gmail.com   
      
   > Where you been, bud?    
   > (1) Psych ward    
   > (2) Prison    
   > (3) Regular hospital vis a vis infirmity    
   > (4) Regular hospital due to antivax sentiment    
   > (5) None of the above.    
   >    
   > Anyhow, good to see ya still amongst the living. These two old    
   > crumpets having a veritable circle jerk here.    
   >    
   > I'm trying to bring a little dignity to this dying froup. These two    
   > cunts are preventing a decent demise. Any ideas?    
      
   Canary in the coal mine.   
   Brians as hypnotised by TV as it gets.   
      
   >    
   >    
   > "Capitalism is the exploitation of man by man,    
   > whereas communism is the reverse"    
   >    
   > Old Russian joke   
      
   Just chillin, watching the narrative fall to pieces.   
   I actually have a real fancy nuthouse close by.   
   Triple basketball courts indoors, french trained chefs, five stars.   
   Did that tennis player holding the title get to play?   
   Here's a bit from the USG's main "Phenomenon" guy.    
   Heard him several times, he knows the scope of the physics.   
      
   Washington Post Live   
   Transcript: UFOs & National Security with Luis Elizondo, Former Director,   
   Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program   
   By Washington Post Live   
   June 8, 2021 at 7:19 p.m. EDT   
      
   MS. ALEMANY: [In progress] --UFOs or as it’s officially identi   
   ied--officially called, unidentified aerial phenomenon, UAPs. While we’re   
   waiting for the unclassified report from Congress on the matter, our guest,   
   Lue Elizondo, the former director for    
   AATIP, the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, has some answers.   
   So excited to welcome you today, Lue. Thanks for joining us.   
      
   MR. ELIZONDO: Jackie, it is my sincere pleasure to be with you and your   
   audience today. Thank you very much for having me.   
      
   MS. ALEMANY: So, I want to take us back for a second and set the table for   
   this conversation. How exactly did you get signed in the first place to   
   investigate UFOs for the intelligence community?   
      
   MR. ELIZONDO: Well, Jackie, quite frankly, I was voluntold. In essence I had   
   some--I guess some prerequisite experience that they were looking for. At the   
   time, the organization was fairly new, and they were looking for someone to   
   create a    
   counterintelligence and security portfolio. And I guess because of some of my   
   background running investigations, counterintelligence investigations, and   
   some of my background in technology protection, specifically with aerospace   
   systems, that probably, I    
   suspect, was a fairly lucrative skillset that they were looking for to create   
   this sub portfolio under AATIP. And that’s how I got into the program. I   
   entered the program in 2008. I was asked by its director to come on board and   
   establish this program,    
   and then in 2010 was when I was asked to take over the effort.   
      
   MS. ALEMANY: And I’m sure many of you are well aware of this. If you are   
   tuning in, you’ve probably watched the documentary that came out this year,   
   "The Phenomenon." Senator Harry Reid, which this doc outlines, got the program   
   funded. Did you brief    
   him in Congress on these unexplained pilot sightings when you were running the   
   program?   
      
   MR. ELIZONDO: Jackie, we provide many briefings, mostly through DOD and   
   intelligence community leadership. That information was also provided to times   
   to the staffers and of course our elected officials. It’s very important   
   that when you’re working    
   in a national security construct that you try to follow the chain of command   
   as much as possible. So, a lot of my briefings were really to more senior   
   level folks in the Department of Defense and within our intelligence   
   architecture. But there were times,   
    yes, that we were--we would be asked to brief other officials, particularly   
   in the legislative branch and in the executive branch as well.   
      
   MS. ALEMANY: And right now, everyone in Washington and really a lot of people   
   around this country are hotly anticipating this unclassified government report   
   on aerial phenomena witnessed by Navy pilots. It’s expected to be delivered   
   to the Senate    
   Intelligence community by the director of national intelligence, hopefully by   
   June 25th. The New York Times reported that senior administration officials   
   who were briefed on the findings said that the unusual movements witnessed by   
   pilots did not    
   originate from American military or advanced U.S. government technology, but   
   that’s really about the only conclusive finding that has been so far teased   
   from the report. What do you think the likelihood that aerial phenomena are   
   actually    
   extraterrestrial spacecraft?   
      
   MR. ELIZONDO: Well, Jackie, that’s really the question, isn’t it? The   
   bottom line is, up until very recently there were really only three   
   possibilities of what this could be. And the first possibility is that it is   
   some sort of secret U.S. tech that    
   somehow, we have managed to keep secret even from ourselves for a long period   
   of time. The second option is that it is some sort of foreign adversarial   
   technology that has somehow managed to technology leapfrog ahead of our   
   country despite having a    
   fairly robust and comprehensive intelligence apparatus. And of course, the   
   third option is something quite entirely different. It’s a different   
   paradigm completely.   
      
   Now as of this week we now know through some of the discussions at   
   senior-level leadership that this report has definitively stated once and for   
   all that it’s not our technology. And that’s hugely important. For 30   
   years there has always been this    
   undercurrent, if you will, these conspiracies that there was some sort of   
   TR-3B program and some sort of a super special technology that has been   
   implemented and we’ve been--just been very careless about it. And I think   
   that argument was finally put to    
   bed this week. So that really only leaves two other options, and   
   that’s--again, it’s foreign adversarial or it’s something quite   
   different. And I think we’re now beginning to learn, as we’ve heard from   
   the director of national intelligence--and    
   I can certainly tell you from my experience--that we’re pretty confident   
   that it’s not Russian or Chinese technology, and there’s several reason   
   for that that, if you like, I’m more than happy to go into.   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)