From: libertidad@south.south.com   
      
   On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 21:04:13 -0800 (PST), LowRider44M   
    wrote:   
      
   >   
   >> Where you been, bud?   
   >> (1) Psych ward   
   >> (2) Prison   
   >> (3) Regular hospital vis a vis infirmity   
   >> (4) Regular hospital due to antivax sentiment   
   >> (5) None of the above.   
   >>   
   >> Anyhow, good to see ya still amongst the living. These two old   
   >> crumpets having a veritable circle jerk here.   
   >>   
   >> I'm trying to bring a little dignity to this dying froup. These two   
   >> cunts are preventing a decent demise. Any ideas?   
   >   
   >Canary in the coal mine.   
   >Brians as hypnotised by TV as it gets.   
   >   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> "Capitalism is the exploitation of man by man,   
   >> whereas communism is the reverse"   
   >>   
   >> Old Russian joke   
   >   
   >Just chillin, watching the narrative fall to pieces.   
   >I actually have a real fancy nuthouse close by.   
   >Triple basketball courts indoors, french trained chefs, five stars.   
   >Did that tennis player holding the title get to play?   
   >Here's a bit from the USG's main "Phenomenon" guy.   
   >Heard him several times, he knows the scope of the physics.   
      
   It's falling to pieces alright.  Putin on the warpath, stupid middle   
   power politicians like Boris and our yobbo wanting to fight a nuclear   
   armed superpower, Biden out of his depth, the Germans showing the   
   world they are fucking cowards sucking Russia's gas from the phallus   
   shaped pipe, good LORD what the FUCK??   
      
   Stupid Brian doesn't realise that London is a big fat fucking target.   
   The Rooshians are even having naval wargames off the coast of Ireland,   
   who never did anybody any harm at all and were a neutral country in   
   WW2 because the fucking HATE the sassenachs (English) inventors of the   
   concentration camps.   
      
   >   
   >Washington Post Live   
   >Transcript: UFOs & National Security with Luis Elizondo, Former Director,   
   Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program   
   >By Washington Post Live   
   >June 8, 2021 at 7:19 p.m. EDT   
   >   
   >MS. ALEMANY: [In progress] --UFOs or as it’s officially ident   
   fied--officially called, unidentified aerial phenomenon, UAPs. While we’re   
   waiting for the unclassified report from Congress on the matter, our guest,   
   Lue Elizondo, the former director    
   for AATIP, the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, has some   
   answers. So   
   excited to welcome you today, Lue. Thanks for joining us.   
   >   
   >MR. ELIZONDO: Jackie, it is my sincere pleasure to be with you and your   
   audience today. Thank you very much for having me.   
   >   
   >MS. ALEMANY: So, I want to take us back for a second and set the table for   
   this conversation. How exactly did you get signed in the first place to   
   investigate UFOs for the intelligence community?   
   >   
   >MR. ELIZONDO: Well, Jackie, quite frankly, I was voluntold. In essence I had   
   some--I guess some prerequisite experience that they were looking for. At the   
   time, the organization was fairly new, and they were looking for someone to   
   create a    
   counterintelligence and security portfolio. And I guess because of some of my   
   background   
   running investigations, counterintelligence investigations, and some of my   
   background in technology protection, specifically with aerospace systems, that   
   probably, I suspect, was a fairly lucrative skillset that they were looking   
   for to create this sub    
   portfolio under AATIP. And that’s how I got into the program. I entered the   
   program in 2008. I was asked by its director to come on board and establish   
   this program, and then in 2010 was when I was asked to take over the effort.   
   >   
   >MS. ALEMANY: And I’m sure many of you are well aware of this. If you are   
   tuning in, you’ve probably watched the documentary that came out this year,   
   "The Phenomenon." Senator Harry Reid, which this doc outlines, got the program   
   funded. Did you brief    
   him in Congress on these unexplained pilot sightings when you were running the   
   program?   
   >   
   >MR. ELIZONDO: Jackie, we provide many briefings, mostly through DOD and   
   intelligence community leadership. That information was also provided to times   
   to the staffers and of course our elected officials. It’s very important   
   that when you’re working    
   in a national security construct that you try to follow the chain of command as   
   much as possible. So, a lot of my briefings were really to more senior level   
   folks in the Department of Defense and within our intelligence architecture.   
   But there were times, yes, that we were--we would be asked to brief other   
   officials, particularly in    
   the legislative branch and in the executive branch as well.   
   >   
   >MS. ALEMANY: And right now, everyone in Washington and really a lot of people   
   around this country are hotly anticipating this unclassified government report   
   on aerial phenomena witnessed by Navy pilots. It’s expected to be delivered   
   to the Senate    
   Intelligence community by the director of national intelligence, hopefully by   
   June   
   25th. The New York Times reported that senior administration officials who   
   were briefed on the findings said that the unusual movements witnessed by   
   pilots did not originate from American military or advanced U.S. government   
   technology, but that’s    
   really about the only conclusive finding that has been so far teased from the   
   report.   
   What do you think the likelihood that aerial phenomena are actually   
   extraterrestrial spacecraft?   
   >   
   >MR. ELIZONDO: Well, Jackie, that’s really the question, isn’t it? The   
   bottom line is, up until very recently there were really only three   
   possibilities of what this could be. And the first possibility is that it is   
   some sort of secret U.S. tech that    
   somehow, we have managed to keep secret even from ourselves for a long period   
   of   
   time. The second option is that it is some sort of foreign adversarial   
   technology that has somehow managed to technology leapfrog ahead of our   
   country despite having a fairly robust and comprehensive intelligence   
   apparatus. And of course, the third    
   option is something quite entirely different. It’s a different paradigm   
   completely.   
   >   
   >Now as of this week we now know through some of the discussions at   
   senior-level leadership that this report has definitively stated once and for   
   all that it’s not our technology. And that’s hugely important. For 30   
   years there has always been this    
   undercurrent, if you will, these conspiracies that there was some sort of TR-3B   
   program and some sort of a super special technology that has been implemented   
   and we’ve been--just been very careless about it. And I think that argument   
   was finally put to bed this week. So that really only leaves two other   
   options, and that’s--   
   again, it’s foreign adversarial or it’s something quite different. And I   
   think we’re   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)