Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.dreams.castaneda    |    The Art of Dreaming by Carlos Castaneda    |    26,979 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 26,456 of 26,979    |
|    slider to All    |
|    Direct confrontation between Russia and     |
|    20 Dec 22 17:32:11    |
      From: slider@anashram.com              Several insiders reported that NATO had allegedly decided to officially       enter the conflict with Russia on the side of Ukraine in the coming weeks       or even days. Such announcements were heard from officials of the Polish       Ministry of Defence, the General Staff of the NATO alliance, officers of       the French army and (of course) the Ukrainian Ministry of Defence.              Boris Karpov, a documentary filmmaker and author of the Chronicles of       Russia Telegram channel, expressed his point of view on the subject in an       article published on Rusreinfo website.              According to him, NATO fears that Russia will launch a "general offensive"       that will destroy the Ukrainian army not only in the Donbass, but also in       the territories that remain under Kyiv's control. The NATO leadership does       not even doubt that Russian units located near the Belarusian-Ukrainian       border will strike those territories in the first place.              "NATO has always been very clear: Ukraine SHALL NOT LOSE. Thus, the only       solution for Washington is to deploy alliance troops in Ukraine in a hope       that this will stop the Russian offensive. They hope that Vladimir Putin       will not want to confront NATO directly given the possible (nuclear)       consequences, and he will therefore retreat," Karpov wrote.              However, the author of the article continues, despite the belligerent       rhetoric, NATO's direct intervention in the Ukrainian conflict (i.e. war       with Russia) could be impossible for several reasons:              on the one hand, NATO talks about the current shortage of ammunition and       equipment against the backdrop of massive arms shipments to Ukraine; on       the other hand, the peoples of Europe are hardly ready to support the war,       since they are now more concerned with their survival in the winter season.              What French insiders say              The French army is currently divided into three groups:              bellicose officers who have never seen a war up close; those who want to       remain neutral because they think it is better for the French army to       protect the interests of France; those who believe that this conflict does       not concern the French, and they do not need to interfere in it.              Meanwhile, exercises to prepare for high-intensity war have been going on       in France since March. At first they were held in Central France at       military bases in sparsely populated areas. Now the French military men       practice skills of conducting combat actions under conditions of urban       settlements.              As for President Macron's statements who said that he would like the       conflict to end as a result of peaceful negotiations, French officers       believe that this is just a red herring to give the US and EU time to       replenish their arms stocks.              Indeed, Angela Merkel's recent confessions have already made it clear to       everyone that NATO was not interested in peaceful negotiations. Putin is       not going to swallow the same bait yet again.              In general, no matter what the politicians are planning, the French       military are not eager to fight with Russia.              Politicians stick to their line              On the contrary, the governments of Europe and the United States fight the       temptation to get involved in the war as the economic crisis in Western       countries has been gaining momentum.              A state of war would lead to the introduction of martial law and       comprehensive control over the population. Such a state of affairs may       bring people together in the face of trouble and danger.              Why talk about Russia-NATO war?              Political scientists have two theories on the matter:              NATO's entry into the war will immediately force Moscow to capitulate out       of fear. Western countries will then gain access to resources of the       weakened Russia and President Putin will disappear from international       arena; all this is the result of NATO's intoxication as the alliance fears       Russia's imminent general offensive in Ukraine and thus tries not to let       it happen.              Whatever Western war party functionaries may be trying to pursue, it is       obvious that they are bluffing. It would be strange to assume that the       Russian Armed Forces would retreat if NATO deployed its troops in Ukraine.       This is a very deadly scenario, and the alliance administration is aware       of that.              https://english.pravda.ru/world/155232-russia_nato_war/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca