XPost: alt.support.depression, alt.support.schizophrenia, alt.bu
dha.short.fat.guy
XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism
From: slider@anashram.com
On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 20:02:51 +0100, someone wrote:
> Whether all people who have what is called schizophrenia
> or some people would be able to have more lucid dreams
> and contribute to a culture sounds like a fine topic.
### - i think so too... but that's only one example because the overall
premise included 'other' kinds of mental illness too as thus 'potentially'
being closer to an altered state on a daily basis compared to the average
man in the street, that being my whole point from the start but which you
were refusing to even hear without continually changing the subject, there
being nada about what am suggesting that warrants such evasion, and which
cued my objection to you screwing around for nada...
that what the OP originally said/suggested was indeed a generalisation,
but that doesn't detract from its content being interesting and/or
containing a facet of truth, and didn't deserve being slammed out of hand
(unnecessarily rudely i might add)
i mean, what gives you (or anyone come to that) the right to punch people
in the face for something they're saying or commenting on like that??
especially if what they're saying/suggesting has some merit to it!?
(merit, you've just agreed, would be nice)
no, it was done out of something 'other' than rational debate, it was done
out of cruelty and spite tinged with personal hatred and in my book that
kind of bs is bang out of order, especially when the OP is from my group
and is being attacked for what is ultimately a fairly intelligent
comment/observation (we deal in 'all' subjects here at alt.dreams
castaneda, everything in this world & beyond is part of life so no subject
is taboo, indeed one has to cover everything that is/exists or it's
clearly not complete)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
