XPost: alt.support.depression, alt.support.schizophrenia, alt.bu
dha.short.fat.guy
XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism
From: slider@anashram.com
On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 22:46:45 +0100, % wrote:
> slider wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 21:32:57 +0100, % wrote:
>>
>>> slider wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 20:02:51 +0100, someone wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Whether all people who have what is called schizophrenia
>>>>> or some people would be able to have more lucid dreams
>>>>> and contribute to a culture sounds like a fine topic.
>>>> ### - i think so too... but that's only one example because the
>>>> overall premise included 'other' kinds of mental illness too as thus
>>>> 'potentially' being closer to an altered state on a daily basis
>>>> compared to the average man in the street, that being my whole point
>>>> from the start but which you were refusing to even hear without
>>>> continually changing the subject, there being nada about what am
>>>> suggesting that warrants such evasion, and which cued my objection to
>>>> you screwing around for nada...
>>>> that what the OP originally said/suggested was indeed a
>>>> generalisation, but that doesn't detract from its content being
>>>> interesting and/or containing a facet of truth, and didn't deserve
>>>> being slammed out of hand (unnecessarily rudely i might add)
>>>> i mean, what gives you (or anyone come to that) the right to punch
>>>> people in the face for something they're saying or commenting on like
>>>> that?? especially if what they're saying/suggesting has some merit to
>>>> it!? (merit, you've just agreed, would be nice)
>>>> no, it was done out of something 'other' than rational debate, it
>>>> was done out of cruelty and spite tinged with personal hatred and in
>>>> my book that kind of bs is bang out of order, especially when the OP
>>>> is from my group and is being attacked for what is ultimately a
>>>> fairly intelligent comment/observation (we deal in 'all' subjects
>>>> here at alt.dreams castaneda, everything in this world & beyond is
>>>> part of life so no subject is taboo, indeed one has to cover
>>>> everything that is/exists or it's clearly not complete)
>>>
>>> what a bunch of bull wangle
>> ### - i see... so you're one of those hating/spiteful trolls too that
>> haunts these groups eh?
>> gotcha, no problem, this world is filled to the brim with fools and
>> unthinking morons so why should you be any different huh...
>> at least the OP's idea/suggestion wasn't 'totally' swept under the rug
>> by narcissistic bullies pursuing only their own petty agendas instead
>> of finding summat of value or worthwhile to contribute to this dying
>> world, coz it IS dying ya know, and will take us with it when it goes!
>> but 'you' don't have to worry about things like that huh, you've gots
>> your own selfish crap to pursue whether it harms the planet or not,
>> what do you care as long as you're alright jack??
>> (smile, it never takes long to expose the liars and fakes does it,
>> they always reveal themselves because their ego always has to come
>> first hah!)
>> owwwch! :)
>
> i'll answer the first question i didn't read the rest ,
> it says what they all say so in answer to your question ,
> yes i am
### - which group do you 2 idiots belong to so i can block it in future?
(just be honest for once in your life ok?)
coz the last thing ya's want is someone like moi prowling around your
newsgroup spoiling your shit-shows heh (am really good at that, love it in
fact + have 20+ years of experience hehe)
am whatcha might call a gen-u-ine party-pooper when it comes to trolls
having their pic-nic ;)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
