XPost: alt.support.depression, alt.support.schizophrenia, alt.bu   
   dha.short.fat.guy   
   XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism   
   From: slider@anashram.com   
      
   On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 23:18:21 +0100, Julian wrote:   
      
   > On 13/08/2024 23:13, slider wrote:   
   >> On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 22:47:40 +0100, Julian    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 13/08/2024 22:37, one wrote:   
   >>>> slider wrote:   
   >>>>> one wrote:   
   >>>>>> slider wrote:   
   >>>>>>> one wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> When winners exist, losers exist   
   >>>>>>>> which sounds kinda like a game.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> ### - debating isn't a game,   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> If, for you, it isn't or   
   >>>>>> by definition it isn't, then,   
   >>>>>> it might be semantics or   
   >>>>>> simply how you see.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The debate that is a debate   
   >>>>>> might be great or simply for fun, imo.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> ### - that movie is based on a true story,   
   >>>> Okay.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> it actually happened,   
   >>>> Okay.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> a lowly   
   >>>>> black college beat white harvard university in a debate about what   
   >>>>> the   
   >>>>> definition of morality is and is not,   
   >>>> What is, what was, is and was.   
   >>>> People used to, own, people, naturally.   
   >>>> Now-a-daze people, own, other animals and   
   >>>> apparently, on average may deem it, okay.   
   >>>> Fish in tanks, birds in cages, dogs on leashes   
   >>>> cats kept in houses and horses whipped,   
   >>>> raced and who dares to say right is   
   >>>> wrong and rungs ring a bell eh.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> that regardless of everything being   
   >>>>> against them in a white man's world   
   >>>> Stereotype noted.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> the higher principles won the day and   
   >>>>> the so-called white version of morality lost...   
   >>>> Not sure about the topic at this point.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> much of this later   
   >>>>> contributing to the civil rights movement that argues everyone is   
   >>>>> deserving of good/fair treatment and not just a privileged few...   
   >>>> Animal rights. Children's rights. Women's rights.   
   >>>> When right exists, everyone knows, wrong emerges.   
   >>>> The Tao Te Ching, Chapter 2, could apply.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> iow: this is an example of how human knowledge advances on a daily   
   >>>>> basis   
   >>>>> in the daily waking world, and it applies to both nations and to   
   >>>>> individuals...   
   >>>> Teh struggles continue. Teh, aka Te/De,   
   >>>> at times translated as Virtue, Power, may   
   >>>> be viewed as emerging after the Way is lost.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>> it's an intelligent way of getting at the   
   >>>>>>> truth of an issue, a win-win scenario for both sides because   
   >>>>>>> everyone   
   >>>>>>> comes out the better for it even if they lose the debate,   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> To surrender to win occurs at times.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> To let go and allow to be. A question   
   >>>>>> emerges regarding higher powers or a   
   >>>>>> Higher Power if there is a singularity.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> ### - on the human stage just letting things be results in the strong   
   >>>>> ruling the weak and the law of 'fist' (as in might is right etc)   
   >>>>> ruling   
   >>>>> the world, that being exactly what the nazi's believed in... and if   
   >>>>> the   
   >>>>> world hadn't gotten together and opposed them we'd all be speaking   
   >>>>> german   
   >>>>> now and going to military schools!   
   >>>> The world sounds kinda like a thing. Who your, we, is,   
   >>>> who would be speaking German if not some other language   
   >>>> might be a kind of a sort of a mental noun-thing. Ore knots.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> e.g., you mention the tao fairly often as being a narrative   
   >>>> Tao is a word.   
   >>>> I wouldn't say Tao is a narrative.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> you like/are attracted to?   
   >>>> The newsgroup, alt.philosophy.taoism   
   >>>> is the group from which one is posting. One being   
   >>>> me of all beings as wells well and dwellings vary.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> (nada wrong with that) but under the nazis anything like   
   >>>>> that would have been banned and eventually eradicated   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> that struggle is still continuing btw...   
   >>>> Prior to reading how it still remains unstill instills.   
   >>>> To have a cause at times is able to motivate people.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>> the main thing   
   >>>>>>> is the argument has evolved some, and even if nothing definitive is   
   >>>>>>> arrived at, at least one argument (the losing one) has been   
   >>>>>>> dismissed   
   >>>>>>> from   
   >>>>>>> the equation no matter how much appeal (emotional or otherwise) it   
   >>>>>>> might   
   >>>>>>> have previously had... and overall that's an advance see?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Given various presumptions, yes.   
   >>>>>> Science and mathematics may use such a way.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Psychology might depend more on a society   
   >>>>>> in terms of what is defined as well or ill.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Debates about what is right and/or wrong   
   >>>>>> might change over time, reverse, modified, etc.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> ### - doesn't matter what culture you come from, some things are   
   >>>>> universal   
   >>>>> like don't do any harm, or don't be a low life...   
   >>>> If such a paradigm is your, universal,   
   >>>> then, t'hats your hat, flag and/or struggle   
   >>>> unless it isn't a struggle.   
   >>>> To be content could be a Taoist mode.   
   >>>> Teh, De, Te, emerges after Tao, aka Dao is lost.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>> both sides get a   
   >>>>>>> win regardless of the outcome because knowledge has been advanced a   
   >>>>>>> fraction...   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Seeing as how you appear to see debate happening,   
   >>>>>> thus far, in this thread, what new knowedge have you seen?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> ### - not much, yet (smile...) there's a certain inertia that has to   
   >>>>> be   
   >>>>> overcome/resisted first as people are sticklers for what they know,   
   >>>>> or   
   >>>>> think/believe they know, so being opened minded has to come first   
   >>>>> before   
   >>>>> anything new can enter in (ref. old zen story about needing to first   
   >>>>> empty   
   >>>>> one's cup)   
   >>>> Okay.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> i mean, i look around here and everyone's cups are already filled to   
   >>>>> overflowing, there's no room for anything more or different, people   
   >>>>> don't   
   >>>>> like/resent anything 'different', they like to feel that they've   
   >>>>> gots it   
   >>>>> all nailed down already...   
   >>>> I don't know about, everyone. Nor everyone's cup   
   >>>> being as you say it appears to you to be.   
   >>>> You appear to have a projection screen projecting screens   
   >>>> that screen what apears to you to be, stereotyping.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>> there's a very nice movie about it that explains the above in   
   >>>>>>> detail   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> just cut through all the hollywood-esq bs added to sell movies,   
   >>>>>>> and at   
   >>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>> heart of it there's human awareness, discipline & advancement...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> https://ok.ru/video/2387686132251   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Website has something about cookies being required.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> (an important movie)   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Debaters   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> No idea how that relates to WILD nor Christ   
   >>>>>> or cosmic consciousness, mental illness, healing   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|