From: theBeach@cairo.ankh.io
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 02:44:42 +0100, slider
wrote:
>On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 10:36:54 +0100, He Who Sees All
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 22:53:42 +0100, slider
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ### - hmmm... with gold hitting $2,700 it definitely looks like we're
>>> now
>>> on the brink of a much wider conflict in the middle east, it being
>>> unlikely that anything can stop it now short of iran being nuked into
>>> submission overnight... and because how else could such a vast nation be
>>> suddenly brought to it's knees otherwise without them wrecking israel
>>> 'and' the global economy in the process to boot??
>>>
>>> and because all this 'talk' about hitting just their military sites etc
>>> just wouldn't be enough to stop them launching just about everything
>>> they
>>> have, which is rumoured to be around 150,000 rockets! only a 3rd of
>>> which
>>> would literally flatten israel regardless of their iron dome!
>>>
>>> i.e., just can't imagine israel (or the west) taking such a risk??
>>>
>>> so then methinks we've decided that iran has to go huh...
>>>
>>> and it ain't gonna be pretty!
>>>
>>> oh boy...
>>
>> Slider, you're doom mongering again. It won't happen. No party
>> want's the global elites disrupted, let alone destroyed.
>
>### - still in total denial of reality eh? (and that's why you come to me
>for info huh)
>
>well no one really wanted ww1 & ww2 either thang, but they still happened!
>
>
>
>> Putin
>> doesn't want to lose his $200 bn fortune, his dachas, palaces etc, nor
>> do the Russian oligarchs.
>
>### - 30+ million russians died in ww2, do you think russia really
>'wanted' that?
>
>no, things escalated beyond anyone's ability to choose and everyone got
>sucked into it, that's what a world war is!
>
>
>
>
>> The US billionaires don't want apocalypse,
>> nor do the Jews in Israel who have vast fortunes through their
>> contacts and networks.
>
>### - what the 'west' wants (and that includes israel) is an end to
>fundamentalist islam as a competing entity on the world stage, the seat of
>which resides in iran...
>
>i.e., hammas is gone, lebanon is crippled, and iran's other satellites
>(like yemen and iraq) aren't powerful enough to make any difference on
>their own... the choice now on the table (for israel & the west) is to
>take iran down as well and thus end all this shia-shit once and for all...
>
>and they're genuinely thinking about doing it!!! (scary shit)
>
>or do you really think they wont take advantage of the current opportunity
>they themselves have engineered at such great expense??
>
>
>
>> Israel will not attack the oil or nuclear
>> sites and Iran will make token, but strong, reprisals.
>
>### - that was last year, things have changed since then...
>
>it's gone beyond all that now and israel is effectively in an open war
>with iran fully backed by the west, both sides trying to kill each other's
>leaders ffs! (which is how ww1 started?)
>
>incidentally, gold reached a record $2,740.91 on monday.
>
>
>
>> Then everyone will settle down. There are more pressing problems,
>> such as accelerated climate change and loss of global fertility.
>
>### - lol talk about wishful thinking? the question you 'should' be
>asking, is 'how' is israel gonna emasculate iran without getting
>themselves destroyed in the process via an ever increasing tit-for-tat
>scenario!
>
>i.e., israel is only a small nation and can't handle being pounded whereas
>iran is a vast country! even carpet bombing iran wouldn't have any effect
>on their ability to retaliate en-mass!
>
>well imho there's only one way they could actually do it, and that's to
>level iran's capital(s) onetime when all their leaders are there, else
>iran can systematically destroy israel by firing 1000's of rockets into it
>day after day until there's nada left, or so so much damage done to it it
>can't function...
>
>and israel simply can't afford to let that happen!
>
>the west being only too happy to oblige coz they want iran out of the way
>as well...
>
>and because iran, russia & china are the 3 final obstacles to western
>global domination, remember?
>
>that's exactly what's happening sport...
>
>and it's happening.... TODAY!
>
>(or maybe tomorrow, but sooner now rather than later) for instance, am
>thinking such weapons have possibly already been smuggled into and
>secreted in iran just waiting for a signal to set them off
>
>current chatter however is about whether russia will come to iran's aid
>like they did syria that time coz then the whole world would be dragged
>into it 'regardless' of what anyone wants, whereas several small
>unannounced nukes would be impossible to reverse, with more deaths than
>hiroshima iran would be gone and there'd be nada russia could do about it
>that would be worth doing...
>
>so let's just hope they don't do that huh...
As usual, in the passage of time, I'm proven right and you're proven
wrong...again.
Here it is on 28 October, the Israeli strike has happened, no big
deal, acknowledged by Iran as very minor damage to some radar
installations on the fringe of Iran - and NADA from Iran.
Because, Brian, the global balance will not be upset by either state.
Gaza is a different story, no one cares, no one at all. Nor is
Lebanon a big deal.
But Iran, and Israel, are.
Sorry mate, no global catastrophe this time and probably never.
It's a lovely day here in Perth, Western Australia - 32C today,
tomorrow to be 37C, in November around 40C, moving right up to a hot
summer around 45C or more to peak. Lovin' life!
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
