From: theBeach@cairo.ankh.io   
      
   You're just a run of the mill liar, probably in the pathological   
   sense.  Old and alone in a subsidised flat talking rubbish to total   
   strangers and suffering a major Walter Mitty syndrome minus the charm   
   and intellect.   
      
   Don't you get it?  Your delusion that others are at your level of   
   intelligence or lower is just that, a delusion.  I'm smarter than you   
   and I reckon you scale at around 85+ on the quotient curve, thus...you   
   simply do not get it that people who have been smoking dope for any   
   lenght of time, do NOT SPEAK ABOUT IT LIKE YOU HAVE IN THE LAST COUPLE   
   OF MONTHS!   
      
   They simply don't.  I've been smoking dope for well over 50 years,   
   I've sold it and I've grown it in the sun and also under lights   
   (hysro).  I can clone it, I can graft it and I can feed it.  Now I   
   have a script for it.  I don't think it anything special.   
      
   You talk about it entirely unrealistically, like a uni student from   
   the 1950's, just like someone who has never actually smoked it.   
      
   Fuck off Brian, your time is up.  Back to your little humdrum   
   existence where you can dream bullshit to your hearts content.  Go and   
   have a fucking lucid dream lol   
      
      
      
   On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 13:59:57 +0100, slider    
   wrote:   
      
   >### - gotcha to come out and play tho' didn't i, by appealing to your   
   >vanity hehe + can see that you're your usual cheerful self then huh?   
   >(grinz)   
   >   
   >the loupe pic i can, however, DO (iow: illegal things no, legal things   
   >yes!)   
   >   
   >picked this site at random for 2 pics of my new loupe   
   >https://freeimage.host/i/30F2isR   
   >https://freeimage.host/i/30F2PWv   
   >   
   >although no doubt it wont be enough for you ahaha, the truth being that   
   >you really just don't know anything, and never will, that it's as simple   
   >as that for everyone me old fruit... 'accepting' that is another thing   
   >altogether however, and you're totally on your own there with no one to   
   >help you but yourself, just like everyone else is...   
   >   
   >e.g., in a 'criminal' court of law a person can only be convicted if it   
   >has been proven 'beyond' reasonable doubt that they are guilty, the   
   >standard is deliberately set very high...   
   >   
   >in a civil court, however, the degree of evidence required only has to   
   >prove a 'preponderance' of the truth, a more likely than not scenario, or   
   >more unlikely than not situation, the reason i pointed out judge judy to   
   >you before being because she's actually very 'good' at arriving at a   
   >preponderance of the truth, she pokes, pushes & pulls until she has in her   
   >mind it all going either one way or the other, until she is satisfied of   
   >the outcome definitely leaning one way or the other, she never leaps to   
   >conclusions, and the ones she can't figure she dismisses and sends them   
   >back to their original courts, that's the way she works it!   
   >   
   >my 'point' being that: in the face of a lack of 'absolute' evidence,   
   >evidence beyond a reasonable doubt (e.g., a pic of my prescription) one is   
   >thus forced back into the position of having to weight a preponderance of   
   >the truth over time or forget it altogether... this also being why i   
   >mentioned before that there were other ways to maybe ascertain whether or   
   >not am telling the truth, to which you laffed and rolled your eyes but   
   >didn't take in what i was telling you! (i tell you things all the time lol   
   >but you never fucking listen, just like you're not really listening now?)   
   >   
   >a 'preponderance of the truth' gradually becoming self evident over time   
   >as to whether or not it's consistent information or not for example... you   
   >don't get the truth overnight or all in one go that way, but it instead   
   >adds-up over time to definitely look either one way or the other and   
   >THAT'S what you have to judge, is ALL you are GIVEN to judge, and your   
   >degree of intelligence (or not) in being ABLE to do so will actually be   
   >very revealing as to how quick you are or how slow, or in your case: how   
   >terribly dense hehe :D   
   >   
   >i mean, i shouldn't have to 'help' you with ANY of this by NOW? and you   
   >shouldn't have to bully and coerce your way to the truth either, not if   
   >you're smart that is!   
   >   
   >you always seems to have to start-fresh though every time, as though you   
   >have no access to history or memory, just a very basic set of prejudices   
   >and preconceptions and that's it, you never have any news or desire to   
   >discuss anything, it's all just critiques of everyone and everything and a   
   >stubborn attitude that you ain't ever gonna budge from that position and   
   >that's it, iow an unyielding brick wall (jeremy called that kind of thing   
   >a prick-wall once haha, how very apt!)   
   >   
   >so i totally doubt a pic of my new loupe will change anything and you'll   
   >be back to bangin' the same old, same-old drum, in no time eh slugger? so   
   >very predictable really and thus rather boring, AS BORING as that twitter   
   >group you started and then dumped when you realised something rather   
   >profound: that i'd told you the truth about that group and about your   
   >feelings for it, and to your credit you dropped it like a hot brick once   
   >you realised what a pile of shit it was that you'd created?   
   >   
   >your ONLY failing being to NOT then extend WHAT you'd learned to all the   
   >OTHER items in your life that had perhaps equally ALSO been so haphazardly   
   >thrown together for all the usual wrong reasons, thus explaining why THEY   
   >had also ALL become boring too? - think about it, coz i actually gave you   
   >a gift there albeit you don't seem to realise it, and coz that that's what   
   >friends of this earth tend to do:   
   >   
   >they sometimes help little old myopic ladies to cross the road for   
   >instance haha, go fgure ;)   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 10:38:47 +0100, He Who Sees All   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> You're not teasing me you old fool.  You're deceiving yourself.  I   
   >> wasn't going to bother with a nutcase like you who most probably   
   >> hasn't smoked weed in their entire life.   
   >>   
   >> But you are so damn pathetic I thought I might drop a line, top posted   
   >> of course, just to burst your balloon.   
   >>   
   >> Brian Aherne, you are without doubt one of the most annoying pests on   
   >> usenet I have ever encountered.  You offer nothing but bullshit.  No   
   >> smoker, not even a casual smoker, a once in a month smoker, would talk   
   >> such shit about mere dope.  It just doesn't pass the smell test.   
   >>   
   >> Post a pic of the little loupe you bought on ebay.   
   >>   
   >> Post a pic of your script - I know your name, I know where you live, I   
   >> know your car registration, why not post a pic of your script even   
   >> with your name scrubbed out?   
   >>   
   >> Post a pic of a couple of buds from one of your tubs.   
   >>   
   >> You won't do any of the above because it's all a figment of your   
   >> imagination, just like the little love story you imagined with that   
   >> woman you sent your pic to 20 years ago who dudded you and laughed at   
   >> you behind your back.   
   >>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)