XPost: alt.dreams, alt.dreams.castaneda, alt.dreams.lucid   
   XPost: alt.dreams.mythic, alt.dreams.recurring, alt.dreams.toltec   
   From: Suntop@Wizards.inc   
      
   On 12 Aug 2005 12:21:10 -0700, "Wolfmoon" , wrote in msg:   
   <1123874470.945061.6180@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>:   
      
   >Anyone CAN reply in any way they want.   
      
   I sure hope so :oD   
      
      
   > It's a public newsgroup.  If you want to preach your opinion,   
      
   I dont preach.. I'm not a preacher...   
   I'm not even religious..   
      
      
   >then create a blog and disallow replies and comments.   
      
   How can one communicate both ways if you make a one way media?   
      
      
   > That will insure that even if your words aren't interpreted in the way you   
   wish them to be,   
      
   Has NOTHING to do with my wishing..   
   But EVERYTHING to do with who and what they are..   
      
      
   >nobody will be able to insult your sensibilities with comments that   
   >don't fit in your little box.   
      
   'My little box'?   
   I dont put anyone in boxes or cages ...you seem to do..   
   You dont even know me..and certainly DONT know anything about me..   
   and allready have judged me and tried to 'put me in place' for being   
   something *YOU THINK* i am ...isnt that EXACTLY what u stated above?   
      
      
   >Unless an author is recounting a factual historical event,   
   >it's open to interpretation like it or not.   
      
   And how EXACTLY do you know my words wasnt?   
   Just cause you didnt understand them?   
   You seem to asume ALOT ..dont you?   
      
      
   > For example only; Castaneda wrote many things obviously.   
   >How many of those things got taken literally,   
   >and how many were taken as metaphor?   
      
   Well ..I dont know very much about Castaneda yet ..have read a little about   
   him tho   
   but might need to read more before I think i can answer that question..   
      
   However.. Talking about people who 'stand out' in history one way or the other,   
   generally ..and many (most ..if not all) were of course very much misunderstood   
   in many ways ..and people realized that many times after it was too late   
   Misunderstanding and wrong interpretation is common ways to use information   
   recieved by others ..specially if those 'others' are long gone..   
   (interpret it as you want;o)   
      
      
   >Aside from that, there's this;  When you write something and put it out   
   >there for the general public to peruse, you inevitably cause tangential   
   >thought processes. If that happens to me and I'm sufficiently interested   
   >in the tangent I'm following, I'll post that in a reply RIGHT in the middle   
   >of the thread that caused me to run down that tangent.   
      
   Good..   
   Btw.. can you explain to me, why some people (such as your self)   
   for some weird reason, manages to ALWAYS drift FAR FAR away from the   
   topic and talk about things that dont even have any relevance AT ALL   
   to the current topic?   
      
   >Like it or not,   
      
   Actually ..what i dont like about it, is that some people (such as your self)   
   has to make bad comments, remark that dont have ANYTHING to do with the topic,   
   and create negative and offtopic replies, that makes the whole post drift more   
   and more away from the topic that was actually posted..   
   And I knew this allready from the start, wich is why i also asked NICELY   
   if you could just look past this topic if you didnt understand it..   
      
   But then again ..as you say ..anyone can post anything they want   
   in this newsgroup,so pleace just do what you wish..   
   And asking you to do what you feel is right will prolly just   
   be frawned upon anyways, so im not going to ask that..   
      
      
   >and I don't really care if you do,   
      
   EXACTLY my point...   
      
   >Unless as I said above, you take your precious golden comments   
      
   Precious golden comments?   
   eh..   
   Now you seem to assume things again..   
      
      
   > and post them in a blog, disallowing responses.   
   >Plenty of people do that you know.   
      
   But if i did that, you couldnt reply with your kind and nice comments could   
   you?   
   Nah ..that would be a shame, so I wont do that..   
      
      
   >Incidentally, you CAN create quite a little following doing just that.   
      
   Somehow I doubt that..   
   And besides, why would i have followers??   
      
      
   >By this arguement I am assuming thats what people such as yourself are   
   >always attempting to do in usenet newsgroups..   
      
   I dont like your assumptions..   
   Please, If you could be so kind to not put me 'in a box/cage' with other   
   people i most likely dont have ANYTHING in common with, and certaintly DONT   
   know..   
      
      
   >..be so right all the time,   
      
   Eh?   
   Posting some words that you dont understand, make me right all the time?   
   I cant seem to understand that logic..   
      
      
   >sound so nice and guru-ish   
      
   Guru-ish?? :oD   
   That for sure sounded funny =))   
      
      
   >they get a wonderful little flock of   
   >sheep following them around,   
      
   I dont want any sheeps following me around!   
   Theres too many sheeps in the world allready!   
      
   >never once upsetting them with a contrary   
   >thought.   
      
   To understand the truth, thou must know either sides..   
   You can simply not understand the *WHOLE* truth without actually   
   seeing ALL the parts there is..   
      
      
   >ROFL.   
      
      
   I'm happy this amuses you :o)   
      
      
   --==> Wizard Suntop <==--   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)