XPost: alt.dreams, alt.dreams.castaneda, alt.dreams.edgar-cayce   
   XPost: alt.dreams.lucid.entities, alt.out-of-body, japan.dreams.lucid   
   From: KC@none.invalid   
      
   Ann wrote:   
      
   > Speaking of whom :), do you think the Kaycee fellow spoke from   
   > experience? I doubt it, I mean, by just seeing his/her impatience   
   > (let's call it a J.-temperament:) : "I can't believe I actually read   
   > this far.. anyway" :), it looks as if from the midst of his reason-fit   
   > (fury:) Kaycee came up with the best cure/solution -- another 'bad'   
   > illness' name, go figure.  That is, you're again right to observe that   
   > "anorexia was just a [deep sounding] term used" perhaps to scare the   
   > shit out of me: "a deadly disease", you know :).   
      
   I didn't mean to sound deep, anorexia is just the only word I know for   
   this condition (I'm not a native English speaker). I already explained   
   elsewhere why I reacted how I did: to me it seems you may be putting   
   your own body under unnecessary strain. Experimenting on your own body   
   is fine (at least it's the most ethical option in most cases), but   
   uncontrolled, unplanned experiments kinda defeat the purpose, IMO. I do   
   not wish for you to encounter a genuine eating disorder first-hand.   
   Laugh at it if you wish, but it can be a deadly disease, or at least   
   very deteriorating to you body AND mind.   
      
      
   Cheers, KC   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)