Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.dreams.lucid    |    Ability to control dreams while in one    |    12,284 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,755 of 12,284    |
|    David Mitchell to raipanello    |
|    Re: Hypnagogic Hallucinations (clairaudi    |
|    23 Jan 07 09:40:48    |
      XPost: alt.folklore.ghost-stories, alt.out-of-body, sci.skeptic       XPost: bionet.neuroscience       From: david@edenroad.demon.co.uk              On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 17:08:40 -0800, raipanello wrote:              >       >> Now, given that, which is more likely: the dreaming mechanisms       >> occasionally fire out of sequence, or there is a class of invisible       >> entities which waits around sleepers and whispers in their ears?       >       > A good scientist would think that in the absence of conclusive       > experiments either way, both cases are possible.              I didn't say they weren't both possible - I just said that one was much       more likely than the other.              > A good scientist would       > also try to design experiments to disprove either hypothesis.              True, but a simple "first-pass" test of the "invisible entity" hypothesis       is performed nightly by billions of people.              > In fact, depending on the definitions of your words, both statements of       > yours can be absolutely accurate at the same time.              I don't think so - not without stretching the definitions way beyond       their normal meaning. Would you care to explain what you mean?              > Occams razor is equivalent to a gambling approach to understanding       > reality because it is based on one's own perception and opinion of what       > is "simple".              Whilst I agree that it's usually difficult (to a point approaching       impossibility) to quantify the probabilities that the various components       of a complex explanation are true, the principle (that each element of a       complex explanation weakens the overall probability of the explanation       being true) is undeniable.              Occams Razor is not intended to replace experimentation.              > Sometimes complex is simpler than simple but we just don't       > get it.              I think you could phrase that better - as it stands it's nonsensical, by       definition.              --       =======================================================================       = David --- If you use Microsoft products, you will, inevitably, get       = Mitchell --- viruses, so please don't add me to your address book.       =======================================================================              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca