From: dicksilk@gmail.com
On Saturday, November 20, 2021 at 6:25:12 PM UTC-6, Billy F wrote:>
BF:> “Or My Google [has a problem typing with] Voice To Text”
That could WELL be the problem, INDEED!
A few pointers: the word is “second” not “secant”
and the word “our” sounds like “hour” rather than
“are” . So congratulations on using “voice to text” to begin with!
I took a single class on typing during the 2nd half of my junior year in high
school (around age 16) and it came back to me somewhere in college and a few
years later (when I *really* began using the internet) so IF you can take a
typing class, I *highly*
recommend it.
BF referenced: biblehub.com/1_corinthians/14-22.htm > Tongues, then, are a
sign, not for believers, but for unbelievers. Prophecy, however, is for
believers, not for unbelievers.
Please note that I used a "standardized" citation / weblink to display the
text of that verse. The one you originally used appeared "fractured" to some
extent. As to whether "tongues" mean the same thing as "symbols" is another
debate: any "symbol" is
a written (or drawn, external) expression, whereas anything spoken comes from
within (from one's heart.)
BF:> “the secant time..... Not....... the second time....... ”
I SEE! I thought that *might* be what you meant, but it is a “unique”
usage. Good show! √
BF:>
“[Level 1: The Seer Dreaming Of A Dream
Level 2: Seeing A Dreamer Body Who
Level 3: Seeing A Dreamer Dreaming A Dream]”
OK, so I interpret this as:
1) the “dreamer” experiencing a dream, whereas you described it as an
“Outer Body Experience”.
2) seeing the dreaming, physical body (example, astrally viewing the physical
body asleep in bed) and
3) --I *may* have had similar experiences wherein an aspect of myself meets /
discusses with another aspect of myself, BOTH in an “astral / dream”
state. That’s about the closest I can come to understanding what you meant
*other* than as a
recursion type echo (such as a dream within a dream within a dream….)
BF:> “But I See Not The Physical Body Of This World”
I see “parts of the obverse” in that I see what my eyes see, yet do not
see “my own eyes” or the “backside” of myself, aka the “reverse”.
Jesus has an interesting teaching *related* to this, as written in
biblehub.com/kjv/john/5-31.htm
JC:> If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true.
If one claims to see not the physicality of this world, then one may be
physically "blind." Note that it IS capable for one to have "spiritual sight"
yet be "physically blind" (as well as vice-versa, which is far more often the
case.)
I remember, as a young kid, wondering “what does my *face* look like?” (as
all that I can see are parts of the lips & nose, and maybe touches of my
cheeks if I stick them out using my tongue. And of course, tugging at one’s
eyelids, but that’s
unpleasant.)
Your translation of Genesis 1:26-27 is interesting. I’m more familiar with:
biblehub.com/kjv/genesis/1-26.htm (And God said, Let us make man in our image)
biblehub.com/kjv/genesis/1-27.htm (So God created man in His Own Image, in the
Image of God created He him; male and female created He them.)
But it appears we seem to be stating the same thing: God is man AND woman.
Where we may (or may not) differ is regarding the “sense” of the
“mind” of God maintains Unity as the mind of the male.
BF:> “Knowing Right From Wrong”
I’m more familiar with that as:
biblehub.com/genesis/3-22.htm Then the LORD God said, “Behold, the man has
become like one of Us, *knowing good and evil.* And now, lest he reach out his
hand and take also from the tree of life, and eat, and live forever...”
When one focuses on “A apart from B” one dwells in “sin,” whereas when
one understands “A AND B” one enters the understanding of “Unity.”
(See tinyurl.com/itta-topic-Ud )
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
