Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.dreams    |    The best ones are of the wet variety    |    13,884 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 13,808 of 13,884    |
|    Richard Carl Silk to All    |
|    2024/03/25 Monday: How does one add valu    |
|    25 Mar 24 15:45:42    |
      From: Richard.Silk@Juno.Com              Sorry, readers (if any) - but while the dream was *super-clear* at the time of       dreaming, and *fairly* clear after waking, it's *somewhat* muddled this much       later in the day, but I'll do what I can to repeat it as accurately as       possible.              LAST EVENING, late into the night (past midnight) I watched a rather       *questionable* movie: either A) it was a fictionalized account of a TRUE       story,       or B) a true representation of a fictional story. Either way, it was *thought       provoking* and to an extent, disturbing, yet entertaining at the same time.              The movie was "Confessions of a Dangerous Mind" (imdb.com/title/tt0270288) -       the       "unauthorized autobiography" of Chuck Barris (creator of "The Dating Game,"       "The       Newlywed Game," and "The Gong Show," being 3 of his best-known works.)              A person would have to "watch" the movie to understand how disturbing yet       entertaining it actually is.              The point being, I'm *fairly certain* that the movie was the "cause" of the       "disturbing dream" I had before waking, around daybreak this morning. The       dreamer was as if caught within a building / structure, wherein there were       people (and things) designed to kill the dreamer, including (but not limited       to)       a room where two (adjoining) walls were expanding (inverted!) *into* the room,       sort of like:       ? (« where the space available to maneuver became like a very narrow hallway       along the lower- and left-facing walls.)              Somehow the dreamer escaped that room, only to find there were assassins       outside, and those had to be avoided as well. Sorry, but the dream was so       fraught with tension and "drama" that I've pretty much forgotten most of it,       sort of like "good riddance to bad vibes."              Around daybreak, I let the dog out for a few moments, then resumed my "morning       nap on the couch," where I soon had a *very clear* dream / astral experience,       nearly, *as if* a group of intellectually charged "astral entities" (aka "dream       bodies") were in a room, much like a small, college classroom (or advanced high       school something or other):              Also, as to which position the dreamer / narrative mind was "primarily       associated with" in the dream *may* be position of the headmaster of the class       (aka "the teacher") - regardless, this is about how it "unfurled," so to speak:              The instructor of the class, sort of like a lead philosopher / instructor, is       asking the class (as a whole):        "How does one add value to a person?"              The prepositional phrase of "to a person" seemed less important than the core       structure of the question, "How does              one add value...?" (to any living being or objective "thing.")              There was a clear moment of silence in the "classroom" as the students (those       people gathered there) pondered the question.              Someone (*possibly* the dreamer / narrative mind as well!) requested       clarification of the question, using only two words: "Define 'value'-"              The instructor replied directly (as if he'd been expecting the question) "That       which is greater than zero."              At this point, there was perhaps a *somewhat shorter* pause, and I (as the       person posting this dream) am unclear as to whether it was a "correct response"       *given,* or whether the instructor simply answered it for the class, yet       regardless, the answer was (is) accepted as a "correct" or "valid" answer-              "By giving it [or possibly 'him'] a name."              That is, to give a person (especially as a newborn) (or any *thing*) a "name,"       the individual (or "noun") is given "value." That value may *decrease* into a       negative range if the person becomes a "liar," whereas the individual reveals a       "positive value" when sharing / revealing that which is logically TRUE to       others, to the world. A value of "0" typically indicates that which was never       born.              Clarity? I suppose one could say that depends upon the perception of the       reader       / listener / viewer / receiver.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca