From: blueshirt@indigo.news   
      
   Idlehands wrote:   
      
   > On 2026-02-04 7:43 a.m., The Doctor wrote:   
   > > In article ,   
   > > Blueshirt  wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > So I say again, if you know the stats you are posting   
   > > > are wrong, why bother with them? It doesn't make any   
   > > > sense. You claim to be providing a service to readers   
   > > > by supplying newsgroup statistics. For them to have any   
   > > > worth to the people who find them interesting, they need   
   > > > to be right.   
   > >   
   > > But hese are analysing the groups as posted.   
   >   
   > Another brilliant response by bink, short, concise and   
   > totally incomprehensible.   
      
   And totally wrong!   
      
   You have posted to RADW (and other newsgroups) and everyone   
   on those groups that isn't using NotKnow as their NNTP service   
   sees them. So Dave's stats do not represent the groups "as   
   posted" like he claims... they just represent what posts have   
   been seen by Dave.   
      
   So as Dave doesn't represent the whole of Usenet, his stats are   
   not representative of the people posting to those newsgroups.   
   Meaning... he's wrong!!!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)