From: daniel47@nomail.afraid.org   
      
   On 5/02/2026 10:33 pm, The Doctor wrote:   
   > In article <10m1qdc$33s6e$1@dont-email.me>,   
   > Daniel70   wrote:   
   >> On 5/02/2026 3:49 pm, Idlehands wrote:   
   >>> On 2026-02-04 7:43 a.m., The Doctor wrote:   
   >>>> In article ,   
   >>>> Blueshirt  wrote:   
   >>>>> Daniel70 wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 4/02/2026 9:57 am, The Doctor wrote:   
   >>>>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>>> Blueshirt  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> The thing is, Dave is so dense he doesn't realise that   
   >>>>>>>> everyone knows what he's doing... as they've all read the   
   >>>>>>>> posts that he's censored. So he's just making himself look   
   >>>>>>>> stupid all the time over a simple thing like a list of   
   >>>>>>>> posts to a Usenet newsgroup.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Why would anyone bother?!   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I wonder if you ever set up an INN box BS?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> And what has being able to set up an INN box, got to   
   >>>>>> do with being able to produce an accurate set of posting   
   >>>>>> figures, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy   
   >>>>>> of child sexual molestation)??   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Dave is moving the goal posts. He uses InterNetNews software to   
   >>>>> run his NotKnow servers, but he obviously has filtered out   
   >>>>> Idlehands, so when the stats lists are compiled they exclude the   
   >>>>> filtered posts. But that just means his stats lists are   
   >>>>> inaccurate, and Dave knows they are, but he continues to post   
   >>>>> them as though they are the genuine article. The fault is with   
   >>>>> Dave, because he doesn't want to see posts by Idlehands.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> So I say again, if you know the stats you are posting are wrong,   
   >>>>> why bother with them? It doesn't make any sense. You claim to be   
   >>>>> providing a service to readers by supplying newsgroup   
   >>>>> statistics. For them to have any worth to the people who find   
   >>>>> them interesting, they need to be right.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Butt hese are analysing the groups as posted.   
   >>>   
   >>> Another brilliant response by bink(Word used by paedophiles to indicate   
   >>> their joy of child sexual molestation), short, concise and totally   
   >>> incomprehensible.   
   >>   
   >> Good to read it's not just ME that has problems making sense of Binky(Word   
   >> used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)s   
   >> posts!!   
   >>   
   >>> However once again binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy   
   >>> of child sexual molestation) can't answer a direct question, I wonder why?   
   >>>   
   >> Embarrassment .... to HIM of course!!   
   >   
   > Or you cannot accept the answer becuase your mind is made up already.   
   >   
   BUT *YOU* , BINKY, NEVER GIVE ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ASKED OF *YOU* , BINKY!!   
   --   
   Daniel70   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)