XPost: aus.electronics, sci.electronics.misc   
   From: peter2@hipson.net   
      
   On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:42:16 -0000, "Peter Hucker"    
   wrote:   
      
   >On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:53:51 -0000, PeterD  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:25:43 GMT, "Peter"   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Thankyou for being one of the few who took this question seriously.   
   >>> By "Ladar" I am refering to Laser speed detection. (And no I did not make   
   >>> the term up)   
   >>> As for "Radar", I have a GPS with fixed position speed cameras defined, so   
   >>> I'm fine there.   
   >>   
   >> There is no defense against laser speed detectors.   
   >   
   >What's wrong with the GPS way?  It covers all the known hideout spots.  It   
   doesn't matter what methos the cops are using.   
   >   
      
   You are kidding, right? "All the known hideout spots..." All of them?   
   Around here, that would be virtually the entire state, or at least   
   that part of the state where are are roads, at least. Get real, speed   
   traps are setup wherever the cop wants it to be.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)