From: stoatgobbler@minasmorgul.demon.co.uk   
      
   Shaun wrote:   
   > "Stoatgobbler" wrote in message   
   > news:t1Gml.6176$ot7.1902@newsfe15.ams2...   
   >> Hi there,   
   >>   
   >> Does anyone know if there is a reason why I cannot mount toroidal   
   >> transformers one on top of another (stacking them) with a single metal   
   >> mounting bolt going through both? I can't see anything on the web which   
   >> suggests I don't do this.   
   >>   
   >> Stoat   
   >   
   > The magnetic flux from one transformer could interact with the other one   
   > being that they are that close to eachother. I've seen cases where cases   
   > where the toroidal transformer was made up of two or more rings stacked one   
   > on top of the other, and then the wire wrapped around them all.   
   >   
   > I used to repair industrial electronics and I've never seen someone stack   
   > toroidal transformers before. They mount them side by side with clearance.   
   >   
   > Shaun   
   >   
   >   
      
   Well, I've mounted them on top of one another, I can't find any problem   
   with it.....however....I've got I've used these toroids to create two   
   split rail power supplies (two independent +22v - 0 - -22v supplies) and   
   to make them independant I've "lifted" the 0v commons from the chassis   
   earth via 60ohm resistors. The greater the current I pull out of the   
   power supply the greater the potential difference across the 60ohm   
   resistor. when I pull 1.1A from the power supply then I have nearly 17v   
   across the 60ohm resistor. This voltage does not seem to vary with   
   raising the upper toroidal away from the lower so I don't think its to   
   do with this.   
      
   I've never "played" with this, I did expect a voltage across it (due to   
   eddy currents within the transformer?) but I thought it would be   
   nominal....0.25A is not nominal.   
      
   Is this normal?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|