home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.electronics      Electronics design, repair, worship, etc      7,706 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 6,364 of 7,706   
   clare@snyder.on.ca to ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.demon.co   
   Re: wireless doorbells   
   14 Oct 09 18:04:34   
   
   XPost: alt.home.repair, sci.electronics.repair   
      
   On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:14:58 +0100, Ian Jackson   
    wrote:   
      
   >In message , Bob M.   
   > writes   
   >>"Jeff Liebermann"  wrote in message   
   >>news:m9bad5l68mh8jh9jbe1cdlufqem3fs6f9c@4ax.com...   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> It's not just weather stations.  It's any kind or thermometer that   
   >>> uses wireless for communications.  Most of them are on 433.925Mhz.   
   >>> Also remotes for air conditioners, room lighting, door locks, vehicle   
   >>> alarms, vehicle keys, SCADA systems, and mess of other gadgets that   
   >>> involve key fobs and very low speed/thruput wireless data.  Just enter   
   >>> "433.925" into a Google search for some hints.   
   >>   
   >>Also add "ham radio" to that list. 420-450 mHz is a popular ham radio band.   
   >>   
   >>The same 420-450 mHz band is where the US Air Force's "Pave PAWS"   
   >>radars operate; they have a range of over 3,000 miles. Located at Otis   
   >>AFB, MA, Beale AFB, CA and Clear AFS, AK, these radar beams extend out   
   >>over the ocean, primarily.   
   >>   
   >>And, does the OP's house have metal siding?  Metal siding greatly   
   >>reduces the penetration of the transmitter signal to the inside the   
   >>house.  I had steel siding at the old place & this one; the old place   
   >>had wireless doorbells that didn't always work, even with new   
   >>batteries. This place has wired doorbells that always work.   
   >>   
   >>The OP's remedy is to install wired doorbells.   
   >   
   >Don't forget that these wireless devices are "made to a price". They   
   >usually employ the minimum amount of circuitry which enables them to   
   >function. They may respond to an RF signal on almost ANY frequency,   
   >provided it is strong enough. It doesn't have to have the correct coding   
   >etc.   
   >   
   >Of course, 'electronic' wired devices (even those where no 'frequency'   
   >is involved) also can also suffer from RF interference. But a purely   
   >'electrical' device - like a doorbell - should be OK.   
      
   Years back a cop cruiser keying his mic out front could make many   
   garage door openers operate.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca