From: Daniel47@teranews.com   
      
   Lieutenant Scott wrote:   
   > On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 11:30:14 -0000, Daniel47@teranews.com   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> Lieutenant Scott wrote:   
   >>> On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:14:54 -0000, Daniel47@teranews.com   
   >>> wrote:   
      
      
      
   >>>> Sorry I've been away so long!!   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Your diagram is not going to happen.....ever!!   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Primary power = 240 Vp times 1.5 Ip equals 360 Watts   
   >>>> Secondary power = 120 Vs times 3.0 Is equals 360 watts   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Secondary power equals Primary power, so no (i.e. zero, zilch) power   
   >>>> can   
   >>>> be dissipated in the top half of the transformer, so zero voltage   
   >>>> developed across the top half of the transformer, so Vs must equal Vp,   
   >>>> i.e. 240 V not the 120 V your diagram shows.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Not going to happen....ever!! Sorry!!   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Daniel   
   >>>   
   >>> It was simply a rough diagram to work out the approximate current flow,   
   >>> I was assuming no losses!   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> In my calculations I was assuming no losses, too, so it doesn't work, in   
   >> any case.   
   >>   
   >> Daniel   
   >   
   > The diagram I drew at http://petersphotos.com/temp/transformer.jpg makes   
   > perfect sense to me.   
   >   
   > If you create a secondary coil in the lower half and seperate the two   
   > circuits, it's just like a normal transformer.   
      
   If.....If.....If   
      
   What you drew *Will not* work! No if's, no but's, no maybe's!!   
      
   Daniel   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|