XPost: uk.rec.driving   
   From: %steve%@malloc.co.uk   
      
   Nick Finnigan  wrote:   
      
   > On 28/04/2013 17:06, Steve Firth wrote:   
   > > Nick Finnigan  wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On 28/04/2013 13:48, Steve Firth wrote:   
   > >>   
   > >>> CFLs are quoted as 46-75 lm/W[1];   
   > >>   
   > >>> glow. I replaced four 25W E14 R50 bulbs in downlighters with 4x14W CFLs   
   > >>> (280 lm; 20 lm/W according to the info sheet). The light output was   
   > >>> appaLling and resulted in needing to use two standard lamps and a table   
   > >>> lamp in that room as well as the CFLs just to see what one was doing.   
   > >>   
   > >>    Well, yes, 1000 lumens isn't enough. But why were they so low?   
   > >   
   > > Primarily because CFLs are shite, one assumes.   
   > >   
   > > Are you aware of any E14/R50 CFLs with better light output?   
   >   
   >   E14 R50 14W CFL bring up an ebay seller with 900 lumens, which is within   
   > the normal range you quoted, rather than being worse than tungsten.   
      
   Giving a URL would help. I can't find any such thing on eBay. Unless you   
   mean the Bridgelux bulbs which aren't R50 and are LED not CFL. Searching   
   for E14 R50 14W CFL produced zero results.   
      
   Omitting 14W produces some results but these are 5W (100 lumens) and 9W   
   - lumens not stated.   
      
   --   
   Burn Hollywood burn, burn down to the ground   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)