Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.electronics    |    Electronics design, repair, worship, etc    |    7,706 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 6,949 of 7,706    |
|    Nicholas R Forystek to All    |
|    Part my experience, part quicidence. YOu    |
|    15 Feb 16 20:04:12    |
      XPost: alt.binaries.programming, alt.bumbling.idiots.the.fbi, al       .comp.lang.visualbasic       XPost: alt.comp.opensource, alt.comp.programming, alt.crime       XPost: alt.gov, alt.inventors, alt.irc       XPost: alt.nasa, alt.security.neighborhood, alt.talkers.programming       XPost: microso       From: nicholas@sosouix.net               You need an AddIn ActiveX EXE that utilizes itself as a       pre-cursor to VB6.EXE while VB6.EXE is in execution when it calls it, and       also contains a object component that is part the AddIn to VB6.EXE but in       instanced and viewed by the ActiveX EXE in collective at it's running level.       This has to be a multi instance able app. Also you need VB6.EXE or sometime       with in this ActiveX EXE to have the configuration able to sign your code       during the compile collective similar to as if handled like .NET. In of       which of course it needs to work to be operation in compiling directive from       command line to tiself similar to redunancy awareness. YOu don't have to       have it pushed to yorusystem all in one conglomerate attempt but if your       mear taht of which is VB6.EXE redundancy with a signed app as the interface       then you may tend to see a interference and attempt at Vb6.EXE's life itself       through continuous entry and error after another in path continues not       eratic but goal derived seemingly in path one after another in check and       completes, unless you truly thwarte it off. Is jsut facts they're be in       your sign tool and yoru backups if you dont' be careful about dislocationa       nd backup stability. Too nice is oops, VB6.exe isnt' recompiled so can't be       theoretically signed with out interferance to tiself, even if it was the       wishes of Microsft themselves, all be it they probably do have the the       ability to recompile it from whatever it's derived of in original code.       That's sick, puppies are still fucking with me and my app is showing       ignorance to the update face, skippping a build and executing an old one.       This can't be it's either a crime invasion or a accident ignorance intrusion       to they can't fully or a test? Or jsut real, it's about to become my tenth       get the fuck off my system update and it's going out whether they cache or       not..... oops the other or, highly likely and even scariest, the NTFS       security breach of difference in the WIndows 7 system is being kept and not       thrown everything out that makes me think "Updating/Extracting/Installing"       is not a one reference too many when first putting in a CD to boot       installation. It's a truth with out yuour internet connection. Just       becasue you ahve a FAT/FAT32 USB does not mean it AUTOMATICALLY deserves to       be called fixed by Windows 7 or higher. Then your put in one too many       impressions to teh NTFS security and tryte tested and true mastery over       FAT/FAT32 equivelent to non other then a Linux user privlidge in stength       when domain powered, and plenty of domains NT exist. That means the domain       to teh group to the machine name and username is tree fortified in strength.       Not byte more, no byte less, I think it's the shifting file problem. I'm       getting when I mess around with these images and sort and move them and       sutff, I get they start appearing doubled no matter what when I thin out the       doubles they just keep coming overwriteing there was a file there until it       wants me to thin it to no end and loose all. That is like thsi ActiveX EXE       from the prior builds with a messagebox in for debiuggin that isn't anymore,       Is coming up in the batch compiles like just to get around I compile itself.       So I don't know, I know that certificate hoods themselves transfer like such       but in that they're not to be considered the actaul file they sign. A       certificate transfered is presence fo alot of cryptologic transfer not       information itself like the whole file, that's the illusion it's written on       the file. There's nothing more the customer data in heiarchy form the       issuers.              Stay beatdowns and get up,        -Nicholas Forystek-              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca