home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.electronics      Electronics design, repair, worship, etc      7,706 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 6,949 of 7,706   
   Nicholas R Forystek to All   
   Part my experience, part quicidence. YOu   
   15 Feb 16 20:04:12   
   
   XPost: alt.binaries.programming, alt.bumbling.idiots.the.fbi, al   
   .comp.lang.visualbasic   
   XPost: alt.comp.opensource, alt.comp.programming, alt.crime   
   XPost: alt.gov, alt.inventors, alt.irc   
   XPost: alt.nasa, alt.security.neighborhood, alt.talkers.programming   
   XPost: microso   
   From: nicholas@sosouix.net   
      
               You need an AddIn ActiveX EXE that utilizes itself as a   
   pre-cursor to VB6.EXE while VB6.EXE is in execution when it calls it, and   
   also contains a object component that is part the AddIn to VB6.EXE but in   
   instanced and viewed by the ActiveX EXE in collective at it's running level.   
   This has to be a multi instance able app.  Also you need VB6.EXE or sometime   
   with in this ActiveX EXE to have the configuration able to sign your code   
   during the compile collective similar to as if handled like .NET.  In of   
   which of course it needs to work to be operation in compiling directive from   
   command line to tiself similar to redunancy awareness.  YOu don't have to   
   have it pushed to yorusystem all in one conglomerate attempt but if your   
   mear taht of which is VB6.EXE redundancy with a signed app as the interface   
   then you may tend to see a interference and attempt at Vb6.EXE's life itself   
   through continuous entry and error after another in path continues not   
   eratic but goal derived seemingly in path one after another in check and   
   completes, unless you truly thwarte it off.  Is jsut facts they're be in   
   your sign tool and yoru backups if you dont' be careful about dislocationa   
   nd backup stability. Too nice is oops, VB6.exe isnt' recompiled so can't be   
   theoretically signed with out interferance to tiself, even if it was the   
   wishes of Microsft themselves, all be it they probably do have the the   
   ability to recompile it from whatever it's derived of in original code.   
   That's sick, puppies are still fucking with me and my app is showing   
   ignorance to the update face, skippping a build and executing an old one.   
   This can't be it's either a crime invasion or a accident ignorance intrusion   
   to they can't fully or a test? Or jsut real, it's about to become my tenth   
   get the fuck off my system update and it's going out whether they cache or   
   not..... oops the other or, highly likely and even scariest, the NTFS   
   security breach of difference in the WIndows 7 system is being kept and not   
   thrown everything out that makes me think "Updating/Extracting/Installing"   
   is not a one reference too many when first putting in a CD to boot   
   installation.  It's a truth with out yuour internet connection.  Just   
   becasue you ahve a FAT/FAT32 USB does not mean it AUTOMATICALLY deserves to   
   be called fixed by Windows 7 or higher.  Then your put in one too many   
   impressions to teh NTFS security and tryte tested and true mastery over   
   FAT/FAT32 equivelent to non other then a Linux user privlidge in stength   
   when domain powered, and plenty of domains NT exist.  That means the domain   
   to teh group to the machine name and username is tree fortified in strength.   
   Not byte more, no byte less, I think it's the shifting file problem.  I'm   
   getting when I mess around with these images and sort and move them and   
   sutff, I get they start appearing doubled no matter what when I thin out the   
   doubles they just keep coming overwriteing there was a file there until it   
   wants me to thin it to no end and loose all.  That is like thsi ActiveX EXE   
   from the prior builds with a messagebox in for debiuggin that isn't anymore,   
   Is coming up in the batch compiles like just to get around I compile itself.   
   So I don't know, I know that certificate hoods themselves transfer like such   
   but in that they're not to be considered the actaul file they sign. A   
   certificate transfered is presence fo alot of cryptologic transfer not   
   information itself like the whole file, that's the illusion it's written on   
   the file.  There's nothing more the customer data in heiarchy form the   
   issuers.   
      
   Stay beatdowns and get up,   
                           -Nicholas Forystek-   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca