XPost: alt.home.repair, uk.d-i-y, alt.sci.physics   
   From: CFKinsey@military.org.jp   
      
   On Thu, 06 Jun 2019 23:11:50 +0100, Rod Speed  wrote:   
      
   >   
   >   
   > "trader_4"  wrote in message   
   > news:943fe1dc-72cb-4890-b684-b3aab20b0f99@googlegroups.com...   
   >> On Thursday, June 6, 2019 at 5:45:33 PM UTC-4, Commander Kinsey wrote:   
   >>> On Thu, 06 Jun 2019 22:25:56 +0100, Andy Burns    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> > Commander Kinsey wrote:   
   >>> >   
   >>> >> I noticed some new houses being built, all with environmental shit,   
   >>> >> like   
   >>> >> solar panels, water reclamation from gutters etc.  But why do they   
   >>> >> have   
   >>> >> only 3 or 4 panels when the roof could hold about 12?   
   >>> >   
   >>> > Very little incentive to have any at all now that the feed-in/bribery   
   >>> > tariff has ended.   
   >>>   
   >>> That's what I would have thought, but these houses are only a couple of   
   >>> years old.  None I could understand, loads I could understand, but not a   
   >>> few on each roof.   
   >>   
   >> One factor could be that the output per panel has gone up over   
   >> time.  They were ~200W a decade ago, new ones are ~300W.  But still   
   >> 3 or 4 would be only 1200W, not even enough to equal what a typical house   
   >> uses.   And you'd think that some of the cost is fixed, ie putting in   
   >> 12 isn't going to cost 3 times what it costs to put in 4, so if it's   
   >> undersized, the economics is worse.   
   >   
   > And he's in scotland which isnt great for solar insulation in winter   
   > or even in summer.   
      
   WTF is solar insulation?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)