home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.electronics      Electronics design, repair, worship, etc      7,706 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 7,448 of 7,706   
   Steve Walker to Xeno   
   Re: Very few solar panels on new houses   
   11 Jun 19 07:27:52   
   
   XPost: alt.home.repair, uk.d-i-y, alt.sci.physics   
   From: steve@walker-family.me.uk   
      
   On 11/06/2019 03:16, Xeno wrote:   
   > On 11/6/19 9:47 am, Commander Kinsey wrote:   
   >> On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 00:04:10 +0100, Xeno    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 11/6/19 8:08 am, Commander Kinsey wrote:   
   >>>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 12:24:43 +0100, Xeno    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 10/6/19 6:12 am, Commander Kinsey wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2019 18:11:57 +0100, Rod Speed   
   >>>>>>    
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> "Commander Kinsey"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>> news:op.z24ke1iqwdg98l@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan...   
   >>>>>>>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2019 16:42:45 +0100, Rod Speed   
   >>>>>>>>    
   >>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> "Commander Kinsey"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>> news:op.z24gs5lmwdg98l@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan...   
   >>>>>>>>>> But for no reason, some of them were sliced diagonally across,   
   >>>>>>>>>> making   
   >>>>>>>>>> two   
   >>>>>>>>>> triangular slabs.  I could understand that if there was a   
   >>>>>>>>>> start of a   
   >>>>>>>>>> slope, so the slabs needed to "bend", but there wasn't.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Also noticed what I think is some silly legislation - every front   
   >>>>>>>>>> door   
   >>>>>>>>>> was   
   >>>>>>>>>> accessible without going up steps.  Are 100% of house buyers now   
   >>>>>>>>>> disabled   
   >>>>>>>>>> or something?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Just stupid pollys if it is legislation that says that.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> It's happening all over the UK, we're spending billions catering   
   >>>>>>>> for   
   >>>>>>>> 1% of   
   >>>>>>>> the population.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Yep, your pollys are the stupid. Cant even manage to   
   >>>>>>> do a brexit in 3 fucking years. God knows how you lot   
   >>>>>>> ever managed an empire, most likely by not letting   
   >>>>>>> your dregs or women vote.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Amazing we can't leave something instantly.  It should have taken no   
   >>>>>> more than a month.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Apparently you understand very little of the complexity involved.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It's complex to start doing something, it's damn easy to stop it.   
   >>>   
   >>> Just as complex in this case. You need to reinitiate all systems that   
   >>> were in place prior or, more likely, develop new systems since the old   
   >>> would likely be obsolete.   
   >>   
   >> Copy what's in place or delete it.  Takes a matter of a week or two.   
   >   
   > Why would you *copy* a system you're tossing away?   
   > You can't just *delete* what's in place. You need to transition. What's   
   > more, you need something to transition to.   
   > What existed before the EU is no longer relevant nor is it desirable.   
   > A *new system* needs to be developed, tested and then the *existing*   
   > transitioned to the new.   
      
   You copy most of what is there, with one additional piece of legislation   
   specifying that all refderences to EU rules, regulations, establishments   
   and structures are now to be read as referring to a list of named UK   
   institutions, but then you have the power to change it later. No need to   
   change everything instantly, it can be phased over years.   
      
   SteveW   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca