XPost: alt.checkmate, alt.fan.cyberchicken, alt.fiftyplus
XPost: alt.free.newsservers, alt.philosophy.checkmate, alt.religion.scientology
XPost: alt.sixtyplus, alt.usenet.kooks, can.politics
XPost: sci.physics, soc.men, soc.women
From: jgaylord1@dslextreme.com
On 3/20/2018 7:07 PM, % wrote:
> On 2018-03-20 5:44 PM, joy wrote:
>> On 3/20/2018 5:33 PM, Checkmate wrote:
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>> Checkmate! In article ,
>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:18:24 -0700, Checkmate
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> A proven possibility, and it doesn't involve me faking that I believe.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmmmmm...
>>>>
>>>> You moron, you. There is no such thing as a
>>>> proven possibility. If a thing is proven then it
>>>> follows that the thing is a fact. A fact and
>>>> a possibility are two entirely different things.
>>>>
>>>> Now, STFU. I hate seeing you make yourself
>>>> looks stupid like Nads and kensi. Men are not
>>>> supposed to act like stupid cunts.
>>>
>>> Try not snipping to distort the context of my reply, Rectum-Frencher.
>>> The statement I was replying to said:
>>>
>>>> "Yet you get your flu shots because there's
>>>> a possibility they would be beneficial."
>>>
>>> To which I replied "A PROVEN possibility," meaning your suggestion that
>>> it was a "possibility" is actually a proven FACT. Therefore, you've
>>> just agreed with the intent of my reply, but deliberately attempted to
>>> distort the context of my reply so you could argue with it. Now go
>>> fuck yourself with a mop handle, you snarky little butt berry.
>>>
>>
>> You can't argue with a closed mind.
>
>
> sure you can
But it doesn't do any good.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
