XPost: alt.checkmate, alt.fan.cyberchicken, alt.fiftyplus   
   XPost: alt.free.newsservers, alt.philosophy.checkmate, alt.religion.scientology   
   XPost: alt.sixtyplus, alt.usenet.kooks, can.politics   
   XPost: sci.physics, soc.men, soc.women   
   From: greghall@yacht_maester.fake   
      
   On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 17:33:43 -0700, Checkmate  wrote:   
   > In article , gregh   
   ll@yacht_maester.fake says...   
   >> On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:18:24 -0700, Checkmate  wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >A proven possibility, and it doesn't involve me faking that I believe.   
   >> >   
   >> >Hmmmmm...   
   >>   
   >> You moron, you. There is no such thing as a   
   >> proven possibility. If a thing is proven then it   
   >> follows that the thing is a fact. A fact and   
   >> a possibility are two entirely different things.   
   >>   
   >> Now, STFU. I hate seeing you make yourself   
   >> looks stupid like Nads and kensi. Men are not   
   >> supposed to act like stupid cunts.   
   >   
   >Try not snipping to distort the context of my reply, Rectum-Frencher.   
   >The statement I was replying to said:   
      
   What a whining, sniveling little bitch! Those of us who   
   still retain our memories don't need to read the same   
   old crap over and over again.  FYI, I included all the   
   context that was necessary because I was pointing out   
   your semantic blunder - not deriding your atheism.   
      
   >> "Yet you get your flu shots because there's   
   >> a possibility they would be beneficial."   
   >   
   >To which I replied "A PROVEN possibility," meaning your suggestion that   
   >it was a "possibility" is actually a proven FACT.   
      
   So, stop repeating my truthful statement respecting your   
   lack of understanding of English along with your lack of   
   proper word choice.   
      
   >Therefore, you've   
   >just agreed with the intent of my reply, but deliberately attempted to   
   >distort the context of my reply so you could argue with it.  Now go   
   >fuck yourself with a mop handle, you snarky little butt berry.   
      
   Nice ad hominem, dude!  Don't you know it's the loser   
   who attempts to have the last word by employing gratuitous   
   insults.   
      
   Have a nice day!  (Smackdown)   
      
   --   
      
   Yours Truly,   
   Gregory Hall   
      
   "Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow.   
   (There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries   
      
   http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-k   
   rk-fries-interview.html   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)