44516c02   
   XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: TopCop1988@yahoo.com   
      
   On May 14, 10:17 am, RD Sandman wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   > Zeppo wrote in-news:kms9b6$s25$14@dont-email.me:   
   >   
   >> On Mon, 13 May 2013 19:23:29 -0800, linuxgal wrote:   
   >   
   >>> Zepp the Lyin' Socialist Weasel wrote:   
   >   
   >>>> On Mon, 13 May 2013 18:54:50 -0800, linuxgal wrote:   
   >   
   >>>>>> Scheiße-Tasche wrote:   
   >   
   >>>>>>>> Just another case of Republicans trying to destroy a good   
   >>>>>>>> President simply because he's a Democrat and because they   
   >>>>>>>> can't win on the issues.   
   >   
   >>>>>> If Bush used the IRS to harass Move On.org would that be an   
   >>>>>>"issue"?   
   >   
   >>>> The problem is that the head of the IRS, whose term ended in   
   >>>> November of 2012, was a Bush appointee. It was he, not Obama,   
   >>>> who determined IRS policy.   
   >   
   "The buck stops here."   
   --Democrat Harry Truman   
      
   "The buck never got here."   
   --Democrat Bill Clinton   
      
   "What's a `buck'?"   
   --Democrat Barack Obama   
   >   
   >>>> It was his assistant, the acting commish, an Obama appointee,   
   >>>> who revealed this was going on and apologized.   
   >   
   >>> They want to hang this on one office in Cincinatti but the targets   
   >>> were nationwide.   
   >   
   >> Another point is that at least some of the targets may have been   
   >> legitimate. Any sleazy asshole can form a 501(k) with the word   
   >> "Patriot" in the title, and quite a few have.   
   >   
   > So that makes it OK for the IRS to pursue any entity with a somewhat   
   > like name?   
   >   
   "IRSgate" is growing by leaps and bounds; and the Democrats are   
   running away from it for their political lives:   
      
   Political storm bursts over IRS   
   By Bernie Becker - 05/13/13 08:31 PM ET   
      
   The White House and top lawmakers from both parties on Monday called   
   for broad investigations of the IRS as the scandal surrounding its   
   admission of singling out Tea Party groups for extra scrutiny   
   deepened.   
      
   The response from both parties — and both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue   
   — illustrated how few in Washington want to be seen as defending the   
   IRS, an agency unpopular with the public even on its best days.   
      
      
      
   President Obama said targeting groups politically would be   
   “outrageous” and the agency would have to be held “fully accountable,”   
   while congressional Democrats said they would push the IRS for   
   answers. Leading Republicans called for resignations at the agency’s   
   highest levels.   
      
   “I don’t care whether you’re a Democrat, independent or Republican. At   
   some point there are going to be Republican administrations. At some   
   point there are going to be Democratic ones,” Obama said in a news   
   conference. “Either way, you don’t want the IRS ever being perceived   
   to be biased and anything less than neutral in terms of how they   
   operate.”   
      
   The top lawmakers at the House Ways and Means Committee, Chairman Dave   
   Camp (R-Mich.) and ranking Democrat Sandy Levin (Mich.), announced   
   Monday that their panel would hold the first congressional hearing on   
   the IRS’s actions Friday, one week after the news first broke.   
      
      
   RELATED ARTICLES   
   •Ways and Means sets hearing on IRS   
   •Carney: White House knew of IRS probe in April   
   “The Committee on Ways and Means will get to the bottom of this   
   practice and ensure it never takes place again,” Camp said.   
      
      
   Steven Miller, the acting IRS commissioner who Senate Minority Leader   
   Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Sen. Marco Rubio have pressed to resign;   
   and Russell George, the Treasury Department’s inspector general for   
   tax administration, are scheduled to testify.   
      
   Details from a report authored by George helped spark the blowback   
   from Obama and others since Friday, when an official admitted that the   
   agency gave additional attention to groups seeking tax-exempt status   
   that had “Tea Party” or “patriots” in their name.   
      
   George’s report, parts of which were circulated by congressional staff   
   members over the weekend, asserts that Lois Lerner, the IRS official   
   who discussed the targeting on Friday, knew about it nine months   
   before agency officials publicly told lawmakers they weren’t singling   
   out groups for political reasons.   
      
   The audit also makes clear that the IRS’s extra scrutiny went beyond   
   just Tea Party groups, looking at organizations that focused on   
   government spending or taxes and those lobbying to “make America a   
   better place to live.”   
      
   “Americans expect the IRS to do its job without passion or prejudice,”   
   Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) said Monday,   
   suggesting his panel would conduct a “full investigation” into the   
   inspector general’s findings.   
      
   “We need to get to the bottom of what happened here. I want to see all   
   the facts. We need to know who knew what, and exactly what mistakes   
   were made.”   
      
   Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) backed Baucus’s efforts,   
   saying the reported targeting would be “a terrible breach of the   
   public’s trust.”   
      
   At the same time, the White House is facing accusations from GOP   
   lawmakers that the president and his administration shielded the truth   
   about last year’s attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.   
   Obama responded sharply to those charges on Monday, in stark contrast   
   to his concerns over the IRS situation.   
      
   Press secretary Jay Carney said the White House counsel heard about   
   the inspector general’s report in April, but that both he and the   
   president only found out on Friday. Even so, compared to the   
   developing IRS clamor, there remains more evidence that political   
   appointees were involved in the response to Benghazi.   
      
   The added attention heaped on to the IRS also has raised new questions   
   about the agency’s ability to implement ObamaCare, and about whether   
   the uproar will impede or give new momentum to lawmakers’ efforts to   
   overhaul the tax code.   
      
   The inspector general report, expected to be released publicly this   
   week, found that IRS employees began special searches for Tea Party   
   groups’ applications around March 2010.   
      
   In recent years, Tea Party organizations and other groups have   
   increasingly been seeking 501(c)(4) status with the IRS, a designation   
   reserved for social welfare groups that allows them to shield the   
   identities of their donors. The IRS says annual applications for that   
   status more than doubled between 2010 and 2012, and that the mistakes   
   that singled out Tea Party and conservative groups occurred at its   
   Cincinnati-area office.   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|