XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "%"  wrote in message   
   news:RuSdnSUpfaALoQnMnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com...   
   > Scout wrote:   
   >> "deep" wrote in message   
   >> news:ba78p8tas9tjhvfghabbc3tedt9bmjvnpi@4ax.com...   
   >>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 19:29:08 -0400, "Scout"   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "deep" wrote in message   
   >>>> news:lh38p85kuemf4734npo38fm2kgpk4d0mpk@4ax.com...   
   >>>>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 16:47:25 -0500, RD Sandman   
   >>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>> And I believe Obama signed into law some $800 Billion of additional   
   >>>>>>> spending into that budget while he was President.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Since they had already budgeted more than they had in revenue   
   >>>>>>> shouldn't we calculate that entire amount added under Obama as   
   >>>>>>> deficit spending?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> ;)   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Gee, and here I thought the budget was the responsiblity of the   
   >>>>> House of Representatives.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Since when did The Executive write the budget?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> When he fucking signs the bill into law.   
   >>>   
   >>> After both houses of Congress have passed it.   
   >>>   
   >>> How long has it been since that happened?   
   >>   
   >> Every fucking time a spending bill becomes law.   
   >>   
   >> And did occur when the $800 Billion in spending was added to FY2008   
   >> budget with Obama's signature.   
   >   
   >   
   > a president has to sign it wich other one would you like   
      
   Yes, and in the case of the $800 Billion added to the FY2008 budget...that   
   President was Obama. Not because I like it, but because he was the President   
   that signed the legislation into law.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)