XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: dead@gone.com   
      
   On Wed, 15 May 2013 21:57:22 -0700, Jason wrote:   
      
   > In article , Zepp wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Wed, 15 May 2013 17:23:45 -0700, Jason wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > In article , Steve   
   >> > wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >> On Wed, 15 May 2013 05:06:17 +0000 (UTC), Zepp    
   >> >> wrote:   
   >> >>   
   >> >> >On Wed, 15 May 2013 03:53:21 +0000, Gray Guest wrote:   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >> Zepp wrote in news:kmuord$869$6@dont-email.me:   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 01:00:54 +0000, Gray Guest wrote:   
   >> >> >>>   
   >> >> >>>> Zepp wrote in news:kmrdq5$qn3$5@dont-email.me:   
   >> >> >>>>   
   >> >> >>>>> On Mon, 13 May 2013 18:13:27 +0000, Bert wrote:   
   >> >> >>>>>   
   >> >> >>>>>> In news:dbo1p8dvo2pkvfpgef5a3cl6tm8v48t92u@4ax.com deep   
   >> >> >>>>>> wrote:   
   >> >> >>>>>>   
   >> >> >>>>>>> On Sun, 12 May 2013 22:30:33 -0700, Jason@nospam.com (Jason)   
   >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >> >> >>>>>>>   
   >> >> >>>>>>>>They had a chance to talk to the survivors the week after   
   >> >> >>>>>>>>the attack so they knew the truth--that it was a well   
   >> >> >>>>>>>>planned terrorist attack.   
   >> >> >>>>>>>   
   >> >> >>>>>>> Which nobody knew until much later. The Administration   
   >> >> >>>>>>> wasn't hiding anything. At the time nobody knew what was   
   >> >> >>>>>>> going on.   
   >> >> >>>>>>   
   >> >> >>>>>> Which explains the almost immediate and continuing claim that   
   >> >> >>>>>> the attack was actually a "spontaneous demonstration" against   
   >> >> >>>>>> a movie that no one had seen.   
   >> >> >>>>>   
   >> >> >>>>> Except riots over that movie had taken place earlier in the   
   >> >> >>>>> day in Cairo and other spots. Care to explain that?   
   >> >> >>>>>   
   >> >> >>>>>   
   >> >> >>>> You are one gullible dumbass.   
   >> >> >>>   
   >> >> >>> Are you denying there were riots scattered around the middle   
   >> >> >>> east that day as a result of that stupid video?   
   >> >> >>>   
   >> >> >>>   
   >> >> >> Those dickheads riot all the time at the drop of a turban, about   
   >> >> >> nothing that sane, civilized people would riot over. Maybe that's   
   >> >> >> why they are stuck about 1000 years behind us.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >OK, so you finally have to admit that yes, there were riots going   
   >> >> >on that day. Middle easterners riot, Americans shoot one another.   
   >> >> >Different cultures...   
   >> >>   
   >> >>   
   >> >> But Benghzi was terrorism and Obama and Hillary lied about it.   
   >> >   
   >> > Please don't confuse liberals with facts. It caused them to forget to   
   >> > take their anxiety and depression medications and as a result they   
   >> > may end up hurting somebody in their family.   
   >>   
   >> Doesn't matter how much you clowns lie about it; you can't change what   
   >> the record shows.   
   >>   
   >> Oh hey, I know! Claim that Holder secretly PLANNED Benghazi! It's no   
   >> crazier than the shit you're already spouting, and it has the virtue of   
   >> not having instant falsification.   
   >   
   > To be clear: consevatives are blaming Obama and Mrs. Clinton for   
   > claiming that the terrorist attack was the result of a anti-muslim you   
   > tube video.   
   > That was clearly a total lie. It was a well planned terrorist attack by   
   > radical muslims.   
   >   
   > I don't know what role Holder played in that incident.   
      
   Only outside of same-day confusion, there was no sinister conspiracy   
   regarding Benghazi. None.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|