XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: dead@gone.com   
      
   On Thu, 16 May 2013 11:42:05 -0700, Jason wrote:   
      
   > In article , Malcolm McMahon   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Mon, 13 May 2013 18:26:09 -0400, Scout wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > "Steve"  wrote in message   
   >> > news:8732p8d4g208n7nlbjmj4bts2rerk1j3v0@4ax.com...   
   >> >> On Mon, 13 May 2013 15:22:29 +0000 (UTC), Zepp    
   >> >> wrote:   
   >> >>   
   >> >>>On Sun, 12 May 2013 22:30:33 -0700, Jason wrote:   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>> In article , RD Sandman   
   >> >>>>  wrote:   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>>> Jeanne Douglas  wrote in   
   >> >>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-3FE0AA.21083112052013@news.giganews.com:   
   >> >>>>>   
   >> >>>>> > In article , Zepp    
   >> >>>>> > wrote:   
   >> >>>>> >   
   >> >>>>> >> On Sun, 12 May 2013 19:57:25 -0700, Wayne wrote:   
   >> >>>>> >>   
   >> >>>>> >> > On Sun, 12 May 2013 07:54:21 -0700 (PDT), Davej   
   >> >>>>> >> >  wrote:   
   >> >>>>> >> >> On May 12, 9:50 am, Kurt Nicklas    
   >> >>>>> >> >> wrote:   
   >> >>>>> >> >> > [...]   
   >> >>>>> >> >> > There's new evidence, obtained by ABC, that the Obama   
   >> >>>>> >> > administration   
   >> >>>>> >> >> > did deliberately purge references to "terrorism" from   
   >> >>>>> >> >> > accounts of   
   >> >>>>> >> > the   
   >> >>>>> >> >> > attack on the Benghazi diplomatic mission...   
   >> >>>>> >> >   
   >> >>>>> >> >   
   >> >>>>> >> >   
   >> >>>>> >> >   
   >> >>>>> >> >> Darrell Issa needs both hands to wipe his own ass. I'm   
   >> >>>>> >> >> still waiting for the Republicans to explain why it is so,   
   >> >>>>> >> >> so, so important to   
   >> >>>>> >> > give   
   >> >>>>> >> >> terrorists the publicity they crave.   
   >> >>>>> >> >   
   >> >>>>> >> > The whole thing could be put to bed if Obama/Clinton would   
   >> >>>>> >> > just fess up.   
   >> >>>>> >>   
   >> >>>>> >> Ah, the old "if they weren't guilty of something, why would we   
   >> >>>>> >> be accusing them?"   
   >> >>>>> >   
   >> >>>>> > These Republican assholes are obsessing over the process for   
   >> >>>>> > how talking points are created.   
   >> >>>>>   
   >> >>>>> No, most of the problems are the lies about who created what.   
   >> >>>>> Big difference between what Hillary and the White House claim   
   >> >>>>> they did and what the CIA and FBI claim they did.   
   >> >>>>>   
   >> >>>>>   
   >> >>>>>  They go back and forth and everybody puts   
   >> >>>>> > their 2 cents in and, eventually, the final version is   
   >> >>>>> > produced. NOTHING before that means a damned thing; it was just   
   >> >>>>> > the point of the view of the first people to start the ball   
   >> >>>>> > rolling.   
   >> >>>>>   
   >> >>>>> Do you honestly believe that it took them a week to realize that   
   >> >>>>> video didn't have a damn thing to do with it?   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>> They knew they were lying. They just wanted to make it past the   
   >> >>>> election before revealing the truth.   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>> They had a chance to talk to the survivors the week after the   
   >> >>>> attack so they knew the truth--that it was a well planned   
   >> >>>> terrorist attack.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>>And said so within hours of the attack.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Liar...   
   >> >   
   >> > "(Reuters) - Officials at the White House and State Department were   
   >> > advised two hours after attackers assaulted the U.S. diplomatic   
   >> > mission in Benghazi,   
   >> > Libya, on September 11 that an Islamic militant group had claimed   
   >> > credit for the attack, official emails show."   
   >> >   
   >> > "The first email, timed at 4:05 p.m. Washington time - or 10:05 p.m.   
   >> > Benghazi time, 20-30 minutes after the attack on the U.S. diplomatic   
   >> > mission allegedly began - carried the subject line "U.S. Diplomatic   
   >> > Mission in Benghazi Under Attack" and the notation "SBU", meaning   
   >> > "Sensitive But Unclassified." "   
   >> >   
   >> > "A third email, also marked SBU and sent at 6:07 p.m. Washington   
   >> > time, carried the subject line: "Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims   
   >> > Responsibility for Benghazi Attack." The message reported: "Embassy   
   >> > Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and   
   >> > Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli." "   
   >> >   
   >> > Seems they were told about 2.5 hours after the start of the attack.   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> A claim of responsibility is evidence, but not confirmation.   
   >   
   > Ambassador Susan Rice was sent out to tell the lie that it was NOT a   
   > terrorist attack but instead was inspired by an anti-muslim you tube   
   > video.   
      
   And yet the evidence released this week says nothing of the sort.   
      
   It's a dead scandal, bubbles.  Go back to obsessing about Whitewater or   
   something.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)