XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Wed, 15 May 2013 22:49:14 -0400, "Scout"   
    wrote in alt.atheism:   
      
   >   
   >   
   >"%"  wrote in message   
   >news:RuSdnSUpfaALoQnMnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com...   
   >> Scout wrote:   
   >>> "deep" wrote in message   
   >>> news:ba78p8tas9tjhvfghabbc3tedt9bmjvnpi@4ax.com...   
   >>>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 19:29:08 -0400, "Scout"   
   >>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> "deep" wrote in message   
   >>>>> news:lh38p85kuemf4734npo38fm2kgpk4d0mpk@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 16:47:25 -0500, RD Sandman   
   >>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> And I believe Obama signed into law some $800 Billion of additional   
   >>>>>>>> spending into that budget while he was President.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Since they had already budgeted more than they had in revenue   
   >>>>>>>> shouldn't we calculate that entire amount added under Obama as   
   >>>>>>>> deficit spending?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> ;)   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Gee, and here I thought the budget was the responsiblity of the   
   >>>>>> House of Representatives.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Since when did The Executive write the budget?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> When he fucking signs the bill into law.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> After both houses of Congress have passed it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> How long has it been since that happened?   
   >>>   
   >>> Every fucking time a spending bill becomes law.   
   >>>   
   >>> And did occur when the $800 Billion in spending was added to FY2008   
   >>> budget with Obama's signature.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> a president has to sign it wich other one would you like   
   >   
   >Yes, and in the case of the $800 Billion added to the FY2008 budget...that   
   >President was Obama. Not because I like it, but because he was the President   
   >that signed the legislation into law.   
   >   
   The recession would have been far worse if that bill had not become law,   
   though there should have been far more spending and less tax cutting.   
   Tax cuts are far less effective at fighting recession than government   
   spending is.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)