XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: dead@gone.com   
      
   On Thu, 16 May 2013 18:43:13 -0400, Scout wrote:   
      
   > "Free Lunch"  wrote in message   
   > news:0kmap8tg5mfa7l598bon6assumjaia3153@4ax.com...   
   >> On Wed, 15 May 2013 22:49:14 -0400, "Scout"   
   >>  wrote in alt.atheism:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>"%"  wrote in message   
   >>>news:RuSdnSUpfaALoQnMnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com...   
   >>>> Scout wrote:   
   >>>>> "deep" wrote in message   
   >>>>> news:ba78p8tas9tjhvfghabbc3tedt9bmjvnpi@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 19:29:08 -0400, "Scout"   
   >>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> "deep" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>> news:lh38p85kuemf4734npo38fm2kgpk4d0mpk@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 16:47:25 -0500, RD Sandman   
   >>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> And I believe Obama signed into law some $800 Billion of   
   >>>>>>>>>> additional spending into that budget while he was President.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Since they had already budgeted more than they had in revenue   
   >>>>>>>>>> shouldn't we calculate that entire amount added under Obama as   
   >>>>>>>>>> deficit spending?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> ;)   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Gee, and here I thought the budget was the responsiblity of the   
   >>>>>>>> House of Representatives.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Since when did The Executive write the budget?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> When he fucking signs the bill into law.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> After both houses of Congress have passed it.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> How long has it been since that happened?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Every fucking time a spending bill becomes law.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> And did occur when the $800 Billion in spending was added to FY2008   
   >>>>> budget with Obama's signature.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> a president has to sign it wich other one would you like   
   >>>   
   >>>Yes, and in the case of the $800 Billion added to the FY2008   
   >>>budget...that President was Obama. Not because I like it, but because   
   >>>he was the President that signed the legislation into law.   
   >>>   
   >> The recession would have been far worse if that bill had not become   
   >> law,   
   >   
   > Attempt to change the subject is ignored.   
   >   
   >    
      
   You're so cute.  I bet if you said, "Bill Gates was a failure" and I   
   replied, "But Microsoft made a ton of money" you would whine, "Don't try   
   to change the subject."   
      
   Not only did the stimulus live up to it's name and create ten dollars in   
   economic activity for every dollar spent (including some three million   
   jobs!) but the increased revenues exceeded the outlay.   
      
   In other words, the stimulus did what it was supposed to do, AND paid for   
   itself.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)