XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns
From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net
"Jeanne Douglas" wrote in message
news:hlwdjsd2-A7D3FE.00400118052013@news.giganews.com...
> In article , Zepp wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 18 May 2013 00:18:48 -0400, Scout wrote:
>>
>> > "Free Lunch" wrote in message
>> > news:rpqdp85ridf1kvunnuo5bh3aqusdcf0loo@4ax.com...
>> >> On Fri, 17 May 2013 21:41:40 -0400, "Scout"
>> >> wrote in alt.atheism:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>"Free Lunch" wrote in message
>> >>>news:aeecp8tfpnr4m4el4l74ego9a1nsqn6qen@4ax.com...
>> >>>> On Thu, 16 May 2013 22:22:03 -0400, "Scout"
>> >>>> wrote in alt.atheism:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>"RD Sandman" wrote in message
>> >>>>>news:XnsA1C2C1C9EC638hopewell@216.196.121.131...
>> >>>>>> Free Lunch wrote in
>> >>>>>> news:bnmap814vfj9j8elqps9adk83utebvjmmc@4ax.com:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 16 May 2013 02:12:39 -0400, "Scout"
>> >>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>"Zepp" wrote in message
>> >>>>>>>>news:kn1q41$knk$9@dont-email.me...
>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 May 2013 01:06:12 -0400, Scout wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> "Zepp" wrote in message
>> >>>>>>>>>> news:kn1lji$knk$6@dont-email.me...
>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 22:49:14 -0400, Scout wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "%" wrote in message
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> news:RuSdnSUpfaALoQnMnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Scout wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "deep" wrote in message
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ba78p8tas9tjhvfghabbc3tedt9bmjvnpi@4ax.com...
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 19:29:08 -0400, "Scout"
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "deep" wrote in message
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:lh38p85kuemf4734npo38fm2kgpk4d0mpk@4ax.com...
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 16:47:25 -0500, RD Sandman
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I believe Obama signed into law some $800 Billion
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of additional spending into that budget while he was
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> President.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since they had already budgeted more than they had in
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revenue shouldn't we calculate that entire amount
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> added under Obama as deficit spending?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ;)
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gee, and here I thought the budget was the
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responsiblity
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the House of Representatives.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since when did The Executive write the budget?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When he fucking signs the bill into law.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After both houses of Congress have passed it.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How long has it been since that happened?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Every fucking time a spending bill becomes law.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And did occur when the $800 Billion in spending was added
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to FY2008 budget with Obama's signature.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> a president has to sign it wich other one would you like
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, and in the case of the $800 Billion added to the FY2008
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> budget...that President was Obama. Not because I like it,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> but
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> because he was the President that signed the legislation
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> into
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> law.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> He signed the FY2008 budget in 2009.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> I see.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Tell us MORE, Scooty!
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Why?
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> You're not bothering to read what I wrote.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> What part of "ADDED TO" (emphasis added) do you think means he
>> >>>>>>>>>> signed the original budget?
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Well then, perhaps you could tell us how something he signed in
>> >>>>>>>>> 2009 added to a budget that was over several months earlier.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>Ok..... real slowly. FY2008 runs between Sept 2008 and Sept 2009.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> It runs between Oct 1, 2007 and Sept 30, 2008. I don't know why
>> >>>>>>> they use that convention.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>You will note that Obama took office in Jan 2009. If he signed
>> >>>>>>>>spending legislation between Jan 2009 and Sept 2009 he could ADD
>> >>>>>>>>more spending to the FY2008 budget. Which SOB is EXACTLY what he
>> >>>>>>>>did. To the tune of $800 Billlion in additional deficit spending.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> He did add spending and foolishly added too many useless tax cuts
>> >>>>>>> that didn't help the economy.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> But not to the FY2008 FY which ended 9/30/08. He took office
>> >>>>>> under
>> >>>>>> the 2009FY budget.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>Oops, and I kept saying FY2008.... my mistake. Should have been
>> >>>>>2009.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>Still doesn't alter that Obama is responsible for a major portion of
>> >>>>>that year's deficit.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>So congrats, they won at picking nits and ignoring the point being
>> >>>>>made.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The point being that the additional $800 billion was too small and
>> >>>> not spent fast enough and that too much of it was tax cuts for those
>> >>>> who didn't need tax cuts.
>> >>>
>> >>>Well to date he's spent over $6 Trillion in deficit spending....so
>> >>>when
>> >>>exactly will it be enough?
>> >>
>> >> Most of that deficit is left over from Bush's foolish tax cuts and
>> >> unfunded war spending.
>> >
>> > No, actually most of it's from Obama's excessive spending.
>>
>> Prove it. I'm calling you a liar.
>
> What the hell excessive spending is he talking about?
I suppose you think Trillion dollar deficits are typical and normal?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
