XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: dead@gone.com   
      
   On Sat, 18 May 2013 09:18:10 -0400, NoBody wrote:   
      
   > On Fri, 17 May 2013 14:18:28 +0000 (UTC), Zepp  wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Fri, 17 May 2013 06:56:49 -0400, NoBody wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On Thu, 16 May 2013 14:13:36 +0000 (UTC), Zepp  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Thu, 16 May 2013 06:44:53 -0400, NoBody wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 14:41:07 +0000 (UTC), Zepp    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>On Wed, 15 May 2013 07:04:28 -0400, NoBody wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Tue, 14 May 2013 15:52:08 +0000 (UTC), Zepp    
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>Oh, look; it only took 24 hours for Knicker's handlers to tell him   
   >>>>>>>>this was a major scandal.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>Poor Knickers.  Now he has to decide which he hates more: Holder,   
   >>>>>>>>or freedom of the press.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> One notes that Zippo has failed to directly condemn the illegal   
   >>>>>>> and dishonest actions of this administration.  Of course, had the   
   >>>>>>> President been Republican....   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>I have, bubbles.  Pull your head out of your ass and actually read   
   >>>>>>what I write, rather than whining about what you imagine I might   
   >>>>>>have written.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It must have been lost in your endless posting of someone else's   
   >>>>> work.   
   >>>>> Would you care to repost your direct condemnation of the   
   >>>>> administration's actions?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>I see where Knickers posted one of my pieces, calling for Obama's   
   >>>>impeachment, a couple of months ago.   
   >>>   
   >>> You "forgot" to cite or post it here...   
   >>   
   >>Why should I? Oh, right. Little troll games.  I'm supposed to do your   
   >>work for you.   
   >   
   > You claimed you posted a message and I'm asking for you to show that you   
   > have done so since your response is vague and not very searchable.   
   > That's not "trolling" that's asking you to show you have credibility. Do   
   > you have any?   
      
   I posted opinions, bubbles.  Multiple times.  As for the message, I   
   didn't post it: Knickers did.  And added, "At least he's consistent".   
      
   Boy, you're stupid.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)