XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Sat, 18 May 2013 16:17:02 -0500, RD Sandman   
    wrote in alt.atheism:   
      
   >Free Lunch wrote in   
   >news:rmnfp89epf3h5u777iq5ms6dujq3m721fa@4ax.com:   
      
      
   Please note:   
      
   >>>>>> If, as W was, you are adding half a trillion a year to the debt,   
   >>>>>> it is much harder to come out of a recession with added stimulus.   
   >>>>>> W's deficits after 2002 were irresponsible.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Hmmmm, Bush's deficits were:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>2000 - 236.4B - Surplus (Left over from Clinton)   
   >>>>>2001 - 127.3B - Surplus   
   >>>>>2002 - 157.8B - Deficit   
   >>>>>2003 - 377.6B - Deficit   
   >>>>>2004 - 413B - Deficit   
   >>>>>2005 - 318B - Deficit   
   >>>>>2006 - 248B - Deficit   
   >>>>>2007 - 161B - Deficit (Democrats now own both Houses)   
   >>>>>2008 - 459B - Deficit   
   >>>>>2009 - 1413B - Deficit (Obama took office in January 2009)   
   >>>>>2010 - 1294B - Deficit   
   >>>>>2011 - 1299B - Deficit   
   >>>>>2012 - 1100B - Deficit   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Totals - Bush - 3674B in Deficits - 8 years 2002 - 2009   
   >>>>> - Obama - 3693B in Deficits - 3 years 2009 - 2012   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Can you point out that half trillion per annum you were talking   
   >>>>>about?   
   >>>>> I only see two years that even come close....2004 and 2008. Of   
   >>>>>course we could throw in 2009 since that budget was passed on Bush's   
   >>>>>watch. It is also counted in Bush's total and not Obama's above.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> According to the Bureau of Public Debt:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Date Total Public Debt Outstanding   
   >>>> 09/29/00 5,674,178,209,887   
   >>>> 09/28/01 5,807,463,412,200   
   >>>> 09/30/02 6,228,235,965,597   
   >>>> 09/30/03 6,783,231,062,744   
   >>>> 09/30/04 7,379,052,696,330   
   >>>> 09/30/05 7,932,709,661,724   
   >>>> 09/29/06 8,506,973,899,215   
   >>>> 09/28/07 9,007,653,372,262   
   >>>> 09/30/08 10,024,724,896,913   
   >>>> 01/20/09 10,626,877,048,913   
   >>>> 09/30/09 11,909,829,003,512   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Date Debt Held by the Public   
   >>>> 09/29/00 3,405,303,490,221   
   >>>> 09/28/01 3,339,310,176,095   
   >>>> 09/30/02 3,553,180,247,875   
   >>>> 09/30/03 3,924,090,106,881   
   >>>> 09/30/04 4,307,344,596,909   
   >>>> 09/30/05 4,601,238,726,062   
   >>>> 09/29/06 4,843,120,736,192   
   >>>> 09/28/07 5,049,305,502,926   
   >>>> 09/30/08 5,808,691,665,404   
   >>>> 01/20/09 6,307,310,739,682   
   >>>> 09/30/09 7,551,861,558,737   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Date Intragovernmental Holdings   
   >>>> 09/29/00 2,268,874,719,666   
   >>>> 09/28/01 2,468,153,236,105   
   >>>> 09/30/02 2,675,055,717,722   
   >>>> 09/30/03 2,859,140,955,863   
   >>>> 09/30/04 3,071,708,099,421   
   >>>> 09/30/05 3,331,470,935,661   
   >>>> 09/29/06 3,663,853,163,023   
   >>>> 09/28/07 3,958,347,869,336   
   >>>> 09/30/08 4,216,033,231,509   
   >>>> 01/20/09 4,319,566,309,231   
   >>>> 09/30/09 4,357,967,444,775   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> A small part of the FY 2001 debt was Bush-inspired, but not much.   
   >>>> The FY 2009 debt increase was shared between Bush and Obama's   
   >>>> stimulus. Let's just look at the other seven years and see that the   
   >>>> debt increased $4.2 billion in those seven years. Maybe Bush wasn't   
   >>>> counting everything in his deficit claims.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>They pretty much match what I put up there. I only showed the deficit   
   >>>itself and you didn't have to do the math.   
   >>   
   >> How do they match?   
   >>   
   >> Date Total Public Debt Increase in Total Public   
   >> Debt 09/29/00 5,674,178,209,887   
   >> 09/28/01 5,807,463,412,200   
   >> 133,285,202,313 09/30/02 6,228,235,965,597   
   >> 420,772,553,397 09/30/03 6,783,231,062,744   
   >> 554,995,097,146 09/30/04 7,379,052,696,330   
   >> 595,821,633,587 09/30/05 7,932,709,661,724   
   >> 553,656,965,393 09/29/06 8,506,973,899,215   
   >> 574,264,237,492 09/28/07 9,007,653,372,262   
   >> 500,679,473,047 09/30/08 10,024,724,896,913   
   >> 1,017,071,524,650 09/30/09 11,909,829,003,512   
   >> 1,885,104,106,599   
   >>   
   >> Your deficit numbers always undercounted the increase in debt. You   
   >> questioned whether Bush increased debt half a trillion a year, but the   
   >> evidence is clear that it was in excesss of half a trillion a year.   
   >>   
   >   
   >Not quite. You said he ran deficits of a half trillion per year.   
   >Deficits (and surpluses) are run against the budget. Overall debt which   
   >you are showing is not. It is an overall cost of government minus   
   >revenue. I showed you the deficits against the budget.   
   >   
   >If you wish to see this clearly, look at Clintons surpluses. The debt   
   >went up every year under Clinton. If Clinton's surpluses his last couple   
   >of years in office were true and actual surpluses you would have seen a   
   >drop in the debt. The difference you are asking about between us is off-   
   >budget items.   
   >   
   >Here...from the same source:   
   >   
   >09/30/2012 16,066,241,407,385.89   
   >09/30/2011 14,790,340,328,557.15   
   >09/30/2010 13,561,623,030,891.79   
   >09/30/2009 11,909,829,003,511.75   
   >09/30/2008 10,024,724,896,912.49   
   >09/30/2007 9,007,653,372,262.48   
   >09/30/2006 8,506,973,899,215.23   
   >09/30/2005 7,932,709,661,723.50   
   >09/30/2004 7,379,052,696,330.32   
   >09/30/2003 6,783,231,062,743.62   
   >09/30/2002 6,228,235,965,597.16   
   >09/30/2001 5,807,463,412,200.06   
   >09/30/2000 5,674,178,209,886.86   
   >09/30/1999 5,656,270,901,615.43   
   >09/30/1998 5,526,193,008,897.62   
   >09/30/1997 5,413,146,011,397.34   
   >09/30/1996 5,224,810,939,135.73   
   >09/29/1995 4,973,982,900,709.39   
   >09/30/1994 4,692,749,910,013.32   
   >09/30/1993 4,411,488,883,139.38   
   >09/30/1992 4,064,620,655,521.66   
   >09/30/1991 3,665,303,351,697.03   
   >   
   >Now, look at Clinton's years in office. Tell me when the debt went down   
   >and his administration didn't add to that debt. He cam pretty close a   
   >couple of times, but he didn't have a big enough surplus to cover the off   
   >budget costs.   
      
   The debt only went down if you net the intragovernmental debt against   
   the general debt. Of course if you net that we don't have a $16.7T debt   
   right now, either.   
      
   05/16/2013:   
      
   Current    
   Debt Held by the Public 11,867,088,850,551.92   
      
   Intragovernmental Holdings 4,867,719,794,096.15   
      
   Total Public Debt Outstanding 16,734,808,644,648.07   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|