XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "Free Lunch"  wrote in message   
   news:a6afp8pgv2e4nj5t35jc2dut79gi80kr5a@4ax.com...   
   > On Sat, 18 May 2013 09:08:53 -0800, linuxgal    
   > wrote in alt.atheism:   
   >   
   >>Jeanne Douglas wrote:   
   >>> Holder had recused himself from the investigation long before this   
   >>> appalling behavior, so how could he have known anything about it?   
   >>>   
   >>> You DO know what "recused" means, don't you?   
   >>   
   >>It means "I'm not in the least bit prepared to testify about anything so   
   >>I better come up with an excuse not to testify."   
   >   
   > No, recusal is his decision to get out of the way of the investigation   
   > and turn it over to someone who is independent of him. It is handing   
   > over power to someone else.   
      
   True....and where exactly in all that does it mean he's IGNORANT of what is   
   going on.   
      
   Isn't he STILL the boss and suppose to know what's going on?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)