XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns
From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net
"Free Lunch" wrote in message
news:mf1fp8draedm1m5hbgr4vpjkgc5hrb379c@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 18 May 2013 00:18:48 -0400, "Scout"
> wrote in alt.atheism:
>
>>
>>
>>"Free Lunch" wrote in message
>>news:rpqdp85ridf1kvunnuo5bh3aqusdcf0loo@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 17 May 2013 21:41:40 -0400, "Scout"
>>> wrote in alt.atheism:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Free Lunch" wrote in message
>>>>news:aeecp8tfpnr4m4el4l74ego9a1nsqn6qen@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Thu, 16 May 2013 22:22:03 -0400, "Scout"
>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"RD Sandman" wrote in message
>>>>>>news:XnsA1C2C1C9EC638hopewell@216.196.121.131...
>>>>>>> Free Lunch wrote in
>>>>>>> news:bnmap814vfj9j8elqps9adk83utebvjmmc@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 May 2013 02:12:39 -0400, "Scout"
>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"Zepp" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>news:kn1q41$knk$9@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 May 2013 01:06:12 -0400, Scout wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Zepp" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:kn1lji$knk$6@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 22:49:14 -0400, Scout wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "%" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:RuSdnSUpfaALoQnMnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scout wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "deep" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ba78p8tas9tjhvfghabbc3tedt9bmjvnpi@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 19:29:08 -0400, "Scout"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "deep" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:lh38p85kuemf4734npo38fm2kgpk4d0mpk@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 16:47:25 -0500, RD Sandman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I believe Obama signed into law some $800 Billion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> additional spending into that budget while he was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> President.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since they had already budgeted more than they had in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revenue shouldn't we calculate that entire amount added
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under Obama as deficit spending?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gee, and here I thought the budget was the responsiblity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the House of Representatives.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since when did The Executive write the budget?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When he fucking signs the bill into law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After both houses of Congress have passed it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How long has it been since that happened?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Every fucking time a spending bill becomes law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And did occur when the $800 Billion in spending was added to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FY2008 budget with Obama's signature.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a president has to sign it wich other one would you like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, and in the case of the $800 Billion added to the FY2008
>>>>>>>>>>>>> budget...that President was Obama. Not because I like it, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>> because he was the President that signed the legislation into
>>>>>>>>>>>>> law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> He signed the FY2008 budget in 2009.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I see.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Tell us MORE, Scooty!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Why?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You're not bothering to read what I wrote.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What part of "ADDED TO" (emphasis added) do you think means he
>>>>>>>>>>> signed the original budget?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Well then, perhaps you could tell us how something he signed in
>>>>>>>>>> 2009
>>>>>>>>>> added to a budget that was over several months earlier.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Ok..... real slowly. FY2008 runs between Sept 2008 and Sept 2009.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It runs between Oct 1, 2007 and Sept 30, 2008. I don't know why
>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>> use that convention.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You will note that Obama took office in Jan 2009. If he signed
>>>>>>>>>spending legislation between Jan 2009 and Sept 2009 he could ADD
>>>>>>>>>more
>>>>>>>>>spending to the FY2008 budget. Which SOB is EXACTLY what he did. To
>>>>>>>>>the tune of $800 Billlion in additional deficit spending.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He did add spending and foolishly added too many useless tax cuts
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> didn't help the economy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But not to the FY2008 FY which ended 9/30/08. He took office under
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> 2009FY budget.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Oops, and I kept saying FY2008.... my mistake. Should have been 2009.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Still doesn't alter that Obama is responsible for a major portion of
>>>>>>that
>>>>>>year's deficit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So congrats, they won at picking nits and ignoring the point being
>>>>>>made.
>>>>>
>>>>> The point being that the additional $800 billion was too small and not
>>>>> spent fast enough and that too much of it was tax cuts for those who
>>>>> didn't need tax cuts.
>>>>
>>>>Well to date he's spent over $6 Trillion in deficit spending....so when
>>>>exactly will it be enough?
>>>
>>> Most of that deficit is left over from Bush's foolish tax cuts and
>>> unfunded war spending.
>>
>>No, actually most of it's from Obama's excessive spending.
>>
> The nonexistent excessive spending.
Then you have no objections with Reagan's spending then?
Odd, I seem to recall you complaining about it just recently,.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
