XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: dead@gone.com   
      
   On Sun, 19 May 2013 11:02:53 -0500, RD Sandman wrote:   
      
   > Free Lunch  wrote in   
   > news:dmohp8dg26d983st15gjh4ieobbbijcktr@4ax.com:   
   >   
   >> On Sun, 19 May 2013 03:47:38 -0400, "Scout"   
   >>  wrote in alt.atheism:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>"Free Lunch"  wrote in message   
   >>>news:cdjgp8h466iql0dm9tcl1qtrp6eskv0g5c@4ax.com...   
   >>>> On Sat, 18 May 2013 20:11:05 -0400, "Scout"   
   >>>>  wrote in alt.atheism:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>"Free Lunch"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>news:ch1fp8hulacbuqh41ll8ii0a5iql81mfeo@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>> On Sat, 18 May 2013 04:41:50 -0400, "Scout"   
   >>>>>>  wrote in alt.atheism:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>"Jeanne Douglas"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>news:hlwdjsd2-A7D3FE.00400118052013@news.giganews.com...   
   >>>>>>>> In article , Zepp    
   >>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 18 May 2013 00:18:48 -0400, Scout wrote:   
   >>>>>> ...   
   >>>>>>>>> > No, actually most of it's from Obama's excessive spending.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Prove it.  I'm calling you a liar.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> What the hell excessive spending is he talking about?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>I suppose you think Trillion dollar deficits are typical and   
   >>>>>>>normal?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I suppose you think that the worst recession since the great   
   >>>>>> depression is normal.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>So you acknowledge the spending is excessive.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The government spent too little to get out of this recession. That's   
   >>>> why it has dragged on.   
   >>>   
   >>>$6 Trillion, wasn't enough.?   
   >>>   
   >>>How much do you think it should have taken?   
   >>>   
   >>>I mean hell that's an average of $45,000 for every man, woman and child   
   >>>in the US.   
   >>   
   >> I had no idea we only had 135 million people in the US.   
   >>   
   >>>You're saying that just wasn't enough?   
   >>>   
   >> The size of the deficit has nothing to do with how effective the   
   >> stimulus. We started with massive deficits from Bush, the stimulus had   
   >> to be added on top of Bush's irresponsible deficits.   
   >>   
   >>   
   > Hmmmm, were Clinton's deficits also irresonsible?   
      
   They declined each year he was in office, and in his final three years   
   were surpluses.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)