XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Sun, 19 May 2013 12:54:36 -0500, RD Sandman   
    wrote in alt.atheism:   
      
   >Free Lunch wrote in   
   >news:ejuhp89o546dmlbfq4ia3fl3hkqagt4ado@4ax.com:   
   >   
   >> On Sun, 19 May 2013 11:43:13 -0400, "Ivan Bodley"    
   >> wrote in alt.atheism:   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>"Free Lunch" wrote in message   
   >>>news:a5qhp8h9cflvk2v2i0dp3repqnas678qnd@4ax.com...   
   >>>   
   >>>On Sun, 19 May 2013 10:45:17 -0400, "Ivan Bodley"    
   >>>wrote in alt.atheism:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>"Free Lunch" wrote in message   
   >>>>news:vkohp817l13u5hbkamfk25sftohdt1no1o@4ax.com...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>On Sun, 19 May 2013 03:45:13 -0400, "Scout"   
   >>>> wrote in alt.atheism:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>"Free Lunch" wrote in message   
   >>>>>news:jrigp8hot1hqrk37sjsd0ptlqdjrqhrace@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>> On Sat, 18 May 2013 20:46:31 -0400, "Scout"   
   >>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>"linuxgal" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>news:H96dnSg-td24HgrMnZ2dnUVZ_sSdnZ2d@giganews.com...   
   >>>>>>>> Free Lunch wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> Republicans have been building   
   >>>>>>>>> deficits into the system for 30 years, but that's only okay if   
   >>>>>>>>> they run   
   >>>>>>>>> the show. When someone else is trying to clean up their mess   
   >>>>>>>>> they whine   
   >>>>>>>>> about how the Dem is running a deficit.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> For the record, I was extremely pissed off when W racked up 4.3   
   >>>>>>>> trillion   
   >>>>>>>> dollars in new debt.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Personally, I've been pissed at mounting deficits for a lot longer   
   >>>>>>>than that.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>What's amusing is to see someone like FL bitch about deficits of   
   >>>>>>>the past   
   >>>>>>>and then give Obama a pass for him much more massive current   
   >>>>>>>deficits.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>He would probably say something like, 'it's different under   
   >>>>>>>Obama', or some   
   >>>>>>>other excuse.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I give Obama a pass for his recession spending just as I give   
   >>>>>> Reagan a pass for his spending during the recession.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>And yet the recession is over and has been over and he's still   
   >>>>>spending money like a drunken sailor in a whore house with a credit   
   >>>>>card.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>A recession is over when jobs are freely available.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>####   
   >>>>Can I quote you on that?   
   >>>> Good!   
   >>>>By the by, jobs ARE freely available.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>YOU can't swing a cat by the tail without finding a job via ANY   
   >>>>newspapers want adds!   
   >>>>Oh, unless YOU are too stupid to exchange water cooler bottles!   
   >>>   
   >>>Employers are still trying to get people on the cheap. When they start   
   >>>paying market wages, they will find people to work for them.   
   >>>   
   >>>###   
   >>>Your point?   
   >>>I already said (and proven) that there are a plethora of decent PAYING   
   >>>JOBS   
   >>   
   >> No, you did not. You said there were jobs. It is clear that they are   
   >> not decent pay or the jobs would be filled already.   
   >   
   >Excuse me, but if an opening, for example, is for pumping gas in a gas   
   >station and you have a PHD, do you think that station owner should pay   
   >you for that PHD or for pumping gas? Bottom line is that there are jobs   
   >open. No one would be asking that person to make a career out of pumping   
   >gas, but it helps pay the rent until the PHD position comes along.   
      
   Who claimed there were decent paying jobs being unfilled?   
   >   
   >>>available in each and every city in the USA, IF you want to have a   
   >>>trade that you are interested in.   
   >>>Butt, if you want to be a lazy retard, then fuck off and die!   
   >>>   
   >>>Of course employers want to hire "people on the cheap" at first, but   
   >>>once they are seen AND deemed as useful, they always tend to be   
   >>>rewarded more! That never happened in YOUR case, has it?   
   >>   
   >> You really need to stop repeating mindless talking points for the very   
   >> rich. You are just another class traitor.   
   >   
   >My companies were merit pay. I didn't start people at the top wage until   
   >I found that they were worth it. They would start at a base wage and   
   >work their up.   
      
   Why would I believe you?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|