XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns
From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net
"Free Lunch" wrote in message
news:83php8pi8t3q8apkj1ruqmvn7cc9ulh637@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 19 May 2013 03:49:57 -0400, "Scout"
> wrote in alt.atheism:
>
>>
>>
>>"Free Lunch" wrote in message
>>news:hfjgp85rqvgip963lh11k0ic00iiaikrg5@4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 18 May 2013 21:53:24 -0400, "Scout"
>>> wrote in alt.atheism:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Free Lunch" wrote in message
>>>>news:mf1fp8draedm1m5hbgr4vpjkgc5hrb379c@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Sat, 18 May 2013 00:18:48 -0400, "Scout"
>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Free Lunch" wrote in message
>>>>>>news:rpqdp85ridf1kvunnuo5bh3aqusdcf0loo@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 May 2013 21:41:40 -0400, "Scout"
>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Free Lunch" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>news:aeecp8tfpnr4m4el4l74ego9a1nsqn6qen@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 May 2013 22:22:03 -0400, "Scout"
>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"RD Sandman" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>news:XnsA1C2C1C9EC638hopewell@216.196.121.131...
>>>>>>>>>>> Free Lunch wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>> news:bnmap814vfj9j8elqps9adk83utebvjmmc@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 May 2013 02:12:39 -0400, "Scout"
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.atheism:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>"Zepp" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>news:kn1q41$knk$9@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 May 2013 01:06:12 -0400, Scout wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Zepp" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:kn1lji$knk$6@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 22:49:14 -0400, Scout wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "%" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:RuSdnSUpfaALoQnMnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scout wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "deep" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:ba78p8tas9tjhvfghabbc3tedt9bmjvnpi@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 19:29:08 -0400, "Scout"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "deep" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:lh38p85kuemf4734npo38fm2kgpk4d0mpk@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 16:47:25 -0500, RD Sandman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I believe Obama signed into law some $800
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Billion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> additional spending into that budget while he was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> President.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since they had already budgeted more than they had
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revenue shouldn't we calculate that entire amount
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> added
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under Obama as deficit spending?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gee, and here I thought the budget was the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responsiblity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the House of Representatives.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since when did The Executive write the budget?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When he fucking signs the bill into law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After both houses of Congress have passed it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How long has it been since that happened?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Every fucking time a spending bill becomes law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And did occur when the $800 Billion in spending was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> added
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FY2008 budget with Obama's signature.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a president has to sign it wich other one would you like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, and in the case of the $800 Billion added to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FY2008
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> budget...that President was Obama. Not because I like it,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because he was the President that signed the legislation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He signed the FY2008 budget in 2009.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tell us MORE, Scooty!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're not bothering to read what I wrote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What part of "ADDED TO" (emphasis added) do you think means
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> signed the original budget?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well then, perhaps you could tell us how something he signed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2009
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> added to a budget that was over several months earlier.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ok..... real slowly. FY2008 runs between Sept 2008 and Sept
>>>>>>>>>>>>>2009.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It runs between Oct 1, 2007 and Sept 30, 2008. I don't know why
>>>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>>> use that convention.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>You will note that Obama took office in Jan 2009. If he signed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>spending legislation between Jan 2009 and Sept 2009 he could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>ADD
>>>>>>>>>>>>>more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>spending to the FY2008 budget. Which SOB is EXACTLY what he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>did.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>To
>>>>>>>>>>>>>the tune of $800 Billlion in additional deficit spending.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> He did add spending and foolishly added too many useless tax
>>>>>>>>>>>> cuts
>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't help the economy.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But not to the FY2008 FY which ended 9/30/08. He took office
>>>>>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> 2009FY budget.
>>>>>>>>>>
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
