XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: NoBody@nowhere.com   
      
   On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:59:59 +0000 (UTC), Zepp  wrote:   
      
   >On Sat, 18 May 2013 09:18:10 -0400, NoBody wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Fri, 17 May 2013 14:18:28 +0000 (UTC), Zepp  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Fri, 17 May 2013 06:56:49 -0400, NoBody wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Thu, 16 May 2013 14:13:36 +0000 (UTC), Zepp  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>On Thu, 16 May 2013 06:44:53 -0400, NoBody wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 14:41:07 +0000 (UTC), Zepp    
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>On Wed, 15 May 2013 07:04:28 -0400, NoBody wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On Tue, 14 May 2013 15:52:08 +0000 (UTC), Zepp    
   >>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Oh, look; it only took 24 hours for Knicker's handlers to tell him   
   >>>>>>>>>this was a major scandal.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Poor Knickers.  Now he has to decide which he hates more: Holder,   
   >>>>>>>>>or freedom of the press.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> One notes that Zippo has failed to directly condemn the illegal   
   >>>>>>>> and dishonest actions of this administration.  Of course, had the   
   >>>>>>>> President been Republican....   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>I have, bubbles.  Pull your head out of your ass and actually read   
   >>>>>>>what I write, rather than whining about what you imagine I might   
   >>>>>>>have written.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> It must have been lost in your endless posting of someone else's   
   >>>>>> work.   
   >>>>>> Would you care to repost your direct condemnation of the   
   >>>>>> administration's actions?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>I see where Knickers posted one of my pieces, calling for Obama's   
   >>>>>impeachment, a couple of months ago.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You "forgot" to cite or post it here...   
   >>>   
   >>>Why should I? Oh, right. Little troll games.  I'm supposed to do your   
   >>>work for you.   
   >>   
   >> You claimed you posted a message and I'm asking for you to show that you   
   >> have done so since your response is vague and not very searchable.   
   >> That's not "trolling" that's asking you to show you have credibility. Do   
   >> you have any?   
   >   
   >I posted opinions, bubbles.  Multiple times.  As for the message, I   
   >didn't post it: Knickers did.  And added, "At least he's consistent".   
      
   Your failure to provide a citation of the post is an admission you are   
   flat out lying.   
      
   >   
   >Boy, you're stupid.   
      
   Boy, you're a flat out liar.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)