XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: kiltmac@gmail.com   
      
   On 5/19/2013 11:01 PM, Jason wrote:   
   > In article , Jeanne   
   > Douglas  wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   >>>>>> Let us know when you have some figures that address that.  You'll need   
   >>>>>> them if you want to show that the IRS was, in fact, being partisan.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> If the numbers indicate a partisan bias, then the guilty need to be   
   >>>>>> punished.  But we need actual evidence, not just bullshit noise   
   > from the   
   >>>>>> far right.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> The IRS has clearly stated that they focused on conservative groups such   
   >>>>> as tea party groups. What more information do you need?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Did they? How many of those groups applied compared with liberal ones or   
   >>>> groups that the law was originally designed for?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> You remind me OJ's lawyers. They claimed he was not guilty of murdering   
   >>>>> his wife. Millions of people watched the trial on television and a vast   
   >>>>> majority of those people said that the evidence indicated that OJ was   
   >>>>> guilty.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You really need to learn how to think clearly.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> That's OK--OJ has still been in prison for the last several years   
   > and that   
   >>>>> is a good thing.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Your analogy is totally false.   
   >>>   
   >>> IRS had admitted guilt in this case. Why are you trying to be an advocate   
   >>> for the IRS?   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   >> Who's doing that?   
   >   
   > I suggest that you read all of the posts that are above and you will find   
   > the answer that you are seeking. I made it easy for you.   
   >   
   >   
   Post it again. After all, you expect us to do that for you when the   
   answer to your question is right above your question.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)