XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: bassist@bass.gov   
      
   "Zepp" wrote in message news:knj2ok$pbb$38@dont-email.me...   
      
   On Wed, 22 May 2013 14:07:42 -0400, Ivan Bodley wrote:   
      
   > "Zepp" wrote in message news:knj0f6$pbb$35@dont-email.me...   
   >   
   > On Wed, 22 May 2013 11:32:25 -0400, Ivan Bodley wrote:   
   >   
   >> "Zepp" wrote in message news:knij3v$pbb$7@dont-email.me...   
   >>   
   >> On Tue, 21 May 2013 23:07:48 -0700, Jeanne Douglas wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> In article , Zepp wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Tue, 21 May 2013 20:40:54 -0700, Jeanne Douglas wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> > In article ,   
   >>>> > Tom McDonald wrote:   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> >> On 5/21/2013 9:41 PM, RD Sandman wrote:   
   >>>> >> > Tom McDonald wrote in   
   >>>> >> > news:reUmt.11860$v46.8618@newsfe13.iad:   
   >>>> >> >   
   >>>> >> >> On 5/21/2013 7:17 PM, Jason wrote:   
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >>    
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >> >>> Good point. I hope they have a congressional investigation   
   >>>> >> >>> about the AP scandal. It's just as serious as the IRS scandal.   
   >>>> >> >>>   
   >>>> >> >>> Someone should write letters to Holder and Obama and remind   
   >>>> >> >>> them that the constitution mentions freedom of the press.   
   >>>> >> >>> Perhaps they have forgotten about what they learned about the   
   >>>> >> >>> constitution.   
   >>>> >> >>>   
   >>>> >> >>>   
   >>>> >> >> Your problem there is that your guy, Bush2, pushed through the   
   >>>> >> >> laws that make what happened to the AP entirely legal. You knew   
   >>>> >> >> that it was legal, right?   
   >>>> >> >   
   >>>> >> > So I assume your take is that since Bush did it, it makes it   
   >>>> >> > alright for Obama to do it? No chance that both of them are   
   >>>> >> > wrong?   
   >>>> >> >   
   >>>> >> No, my take is that just about all of the laws passed in the   
   >>>> >> hysteria about terrorism, especially those that restrict   
   >>>> >> constitutional rights,   
   >>>> >> are wrong, cowardly and un-American. This is an example of how we   
   >>>> >> gave up freedom for almost-certainly-illusory security.   
   >>>> >>   
   >>>> >> Whether it's a Democratic or a Republican administration doing it,   
   >>>> >> I think it's wrong. Period.   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> > And the Patriot Act really needs to be repealed.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Absolutely.   
   >>>   
   >>> But it's been in effect for, what 11-12 years already. So I have no   
   >>> sympathy for anybody just discovering how vile it is now that we have   
   >>> a black President.   
   >>>   
   >>> I was railing against it since before they passed it. I'm really sick   
   >>> of all the cowards who demanded to have their civil rights taken away   
   >>> all of a suddent complaining about it.   
   >>   
   >> Are you out of your mind? I've been fighting the Patriot Act since its   
   >> inception.   
   >>   
   >> #####   
   >>   
   >> Define how and by what measures that YOU personally have been fighting   
   >> the USA's Patriot Act, you retard.   
   >   
   > Speaking out it publicly, sometimes at some personal risk.   
   >   
   > You?   
   >   
   > ###   
   > AND YOU can't document ONE SINGLE METHOD OR TIME WHEN ASKED, you lying   
   > retard!   
   > I never said I did ,or tried or wanted to, you retard!   
      
   I don't need to, bubbles.   
      
   I notice you couldn't even answer if you opposed the Patriot Act or not.   
   You're not in any real position to question me, are you?   
      
   ###   
      
   I am for certain parts of it, you retard.   
   YOU said that YOU WERE STALKED BY THOSE HERE, YOU LYING RETARD!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|