XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: kiltmac@gmail.com   
      
   On 5/23/2013 5:51 PM, Free Lunch wrote:   
   > On Thu, 23 May 2013 10:47:14 -0500, "SaPeIsMa"    
   > wrote in alt.atheism:   
   >   
   >> "Free Lunch"  wrote in message   
   >> news:ch1fp8hulacbuqh41ll8ii0a5iql81mfeo@4ax.com...   
   >>> On Sat, 18 May 2013 04:41:50 -0400, "Scout"   
   >>>  wrote in alt.atheism:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "Jeanne Douglas"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:hlwdjsd2-A7D3FE.00400118052013@news.giganews.com...   
   >>>>> In article , Zepp  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Sat, 18 May 2013 00:18:48 -0400, Scout wrote:   
   >>> ...   
   >>>>>>> No, actually most of it's from Obama's excessive spending.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Prove it.  I'm calling you a liar.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> What the hell excessive spending is he talking about?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I suppose you think Trillion dollar deficits are typical and normal?   
   >>>>   
   >>> I suppose you think that the worst recession since the great depression   
   >>> is normal.   
   >>   
   >> And I'll remind you that it was Democrat "social Spending" that stretched   
   >> out said Depression for at least another decade..   
   >   
   > Please provide your evidence to back up this claim. I am not aware of   
   > any economic evidence that supports it.   
   >   
   I'd like to know as well. The only thing I can think of is that   
   Democrats mostly ran the country during the 30's, and those were the   
   Depression years. Other than that, I can't think of why anyone would say   
   Democratic social spending did anything but help the economy. It   
   certainly went a long way to keeping us from going fascist or communist   
   during that time.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)