XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "Jeanne Douglas" wrote in message   
   news:hlwdjsd2-689AED.03052124052013@news.giganews.com...   
   > In article   
   > ,   
   > Jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:   
   >   
   >> In article , Jeanne   
   >> Douglas wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > In article   
   >> > ,   
   >> > Jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> > > In article , Zepp wrote:   
   >> > >   
   >> > > > On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:47:15 -0700, Jason wrote:   
   >> > > >   
   >> > > > > In article , Zepp    
   >> > > > > wrote:   
   >> > > > >   
   >> > > > >> On Thu, 23 May 2013 00:53:05 -0700, Jason wrote:   
   >> > > > >>   
   >> > > > >> > In article , Zepp    
   >> > > > >> > wrote:   
   >> > > > >> >   
   >> > > > >> >> On Wed, 22 May 2013 18:13:29 -0700, Jason wrote:   
   >> > > > >> >>   
   >> > > > >> >> > In article , "Scout"   
   >> > > > >> >> > wrote:   
   >> > > > >> >> >   
   >> > > > >> >> >> "Klaus Schadenfreude" wrote   
   >> > > > >> >> >> in   
   >> > > > >> >> >> message news:5mdpp81tqd0aml6jajng09vmqik7mnc9ik@4ax.com...   
   >> > > > >> >> >> > On Tue, 21 May 2013 15:54:15 +0000 (UTC), Zepp   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >    
   >> > > > >> >> >> > wrote:   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>On Tue, 21 May 2013 05:04:02 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>wrote:   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>> On Mon, 20 May 2013 14:59:44 +0000 (UTC), Zepp   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>    
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>> wrote:   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>On Mon, 20 May 2013 07:03:14 -0700, Klaus   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>Schadenfreude   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>wrote:   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>> On Mon, 20 May 2013 13:44:31 +0000 (UTC), Zepp   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>    
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>> wrote:   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>On Mon, 20 May 2013 04:55:49 -0700, Klaus   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>Schadenfreude   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>wrote:   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Sun, 19 May 2013 18:48:20 +0000 (UTC), Zepp   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>    
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>Three little words, Klod.   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Two words. Constitutional Republic.   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>No disputing that. And also a representative   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>democracy.   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>>   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Nope. And that you're too stupid to understand the   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>> difference is telling.   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>>Three little words, Klod.   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>>   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>> Two words. Constitutional Republic.   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>>Three little words, Klod.   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>> "You're my bitch."   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>>   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>> [chuckle]   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>Yes, we know what your vision for America is.   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >   
   >> > > > >> >> >> > Oh, pray, favor us with your opinion.   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >>Now: what does the Constitution say?   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >   
   >> > > > >> >> >> > That's easy. The Constitution describes how our   
   >> > > > >> >> >> > government   
   >> > > > >> >> >> > is   
   >> > > > >> >> >> > set up and functions. I can go into more detail when   
   >> > > > >> >> >> > you're   
   >> > > > >> >> >> > sober.   
   >> > > > >> >> >> >   
   >> > > > >> >> >> > Um, you didn't know that?   
   >> > > > >> >> >>   
   >> > > > >> >> >> How could he when he seems unable to make it past the   
   >> > > > >> >> >> first   
   >> > > > >> >> >> three   
   >> > > > >> >> >> words.   
   >> > > > >> >> >>   
   >> > > > >> >> >> Indeed it's not even clear if he knows what they are since   
   >> > > > >> >> >> he   
   >> > > > >> >> >> has   
   >> > > > >> >> >> to keep asking for someone to tell them what they are.   
   >> > > > >> >> >>   
   >> > > > >> >> >>   
   >> > > > >> >> > WE, THE PEOPLE   
   >> > > > >> >>   
   >> > > > >> >> Yup. Poor old Klod can't bring himself to admit that,   
   >> > > > >> >> though.   
   >> > > > >> >> It's   
   >> > > > >> >> been pretty funny chasing him around with it, though.   
   >> > > > >> >>   
   >> > > > >> >> So. there is the statement of intent for the constitution,   
   >> > > > >> >> and it   
   >> > > > >> >> is   
   >> > > > >> >> formed by "We, the People". Establishing that the People are   
   >> > > > >> >> sovereign in America. Not the government, certainly no   
   >> > > > >> >> church,   
   >> > > > >> >> and   
   >> > > > >> >> no aristocracy. The People.   
   >> > > > >> >>   
   >> > > > >> >> With me so far?   
   >> > > > >> >   
   >> > > > >> > You may want to inform Holder that he must abide by the 4th   
   >> > > > >> > Amendment.   
   >> > > > >> > He recently violated the 4th Amendment by tapping the phone   
   >> > > > >> > lines   
   >> > > > >> > of   
   >> > > > >> > various AP reporters.   
   >> > > > >>   
   >> > > > >> Not according to your beloved Patriot Act.   
   >> > > > >   
   >> > > > > Which is more important to you? The Patriot Act or the   
   >> > > > > Constitution.   
   >> > > > >   
   >> > > > > We both know how Holder would answer that question. He would   
   >> > > > > choose   
   >> > > > > the   
   >> > > > > Patriot Act as his answer.   
   >> > > >   
   >> > > > He might. I don't see many Republicans speaking out against it:   
   >> > > > the   
   >> > > > Pauls, and that's about it.   
   >> > >   
   >> > > I hope they have Congressional hearings about this subject.   
   >> > >   
   >> > > Fox News reported yesterday that a lady named   
   >> >   
   >> > Why are you trying to destroy this woman's life?   
   >>   
   >> Because she screwed up.   
   >   
   > Is that any excuse to DESTROY HER LIFE?   
      
   Yes, as a matter of fact it is. If you screw up doing your job then you get   
   fired. She should be fired.   
      
   >Nobody was anything more than   
   > inconvenienced because those applications were not necessary.   
      
   Really?   
      
   Does that include the consequences of LEAKED confidential information to   
   opposition groups?   
      
   Sorry, but having her life 'destroyed" is the least that should happen. If I   
   had anything to say about it not only would she be fired outright, but she   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|