XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns
From: kiltmac@gmail.com
On 5/24/2013 11:44 PM, SaPeIsMa wrote:
> "Tom McDonald" wrote in message
> news:%Txnt.14815$cD1.13244@newsfe29.iad...
>> On 5/23/2013 5:51 PM, Free Lunch wrote:
>>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 10:47:14 -0500, "SaPeIsMa"
>>> wrote in alt.atheism:
>>>
>>>> "Free Lunch" wrote in message
>>>> news:ch1fp8hulacbuqh41ll8ii0a5iql81mfeo@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Sat, 18 May 2013 04:41:50 -0400, "Scout"
>>>>> wrote in alt.atheism:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-A7D3FE.00400118052013@news.giganews.com...
>>>>>>> In article , Zepp
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 18 May 2013 00:18:48 -0400, Scout wrote:
>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> No, actually most of it's from Obama's excessive spending.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Prove it. I'm calling you a liar.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What the hell excessive spending is he talking about?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suppose you think Trillion dollar deficits are typical and normal?
>>>>>>
>>>>> I suppose you think that the worst recession since the great
>>>>> depression
>>>>> is normal.
>>>>
>>>> And I'll remind you that it was Democrat "social Spending" that
>>>> stretched
>>>> out said Depression for at least another decade..
>>>
>>> Please provide your evidence to back up this claim. I am not aware of
>>> any economic evidence that supports it.
>>>
>> I'd like to know as well. The only thing I can think of is that
>> Democrats mostly ran the country during the 30's, and those were the
>> Depression years. Other than that, I can't think of why anyone would
>> say Democratic social spending did anything but help the economy. It
>> certainly went a long way to keeping us from going fascist or
>> communist during that time.
>
>
>
>
>
Interesting. Not sure I am entirely swayed by one study, but this is
grist for the mill.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
