home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.fan.air-america      Air America      2,612 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,796 of 2,612   
   SaPeIsMa to Tom McDonald   
   Re: #WHY THE IRS SCANDAL SHOULD LEAD TO    
   29 May 13 07:36:54   
   
   XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: SaPeIsMa@gmail.com   
      
   "Tom McDonald"  wrote in message   
   news:%bept.42659$9X5.15117@newsfe31.iad...   
   > On 5/28/2013 9:53 PM, SaPeIsMa wrote:   
   >> "Jeanne Douglas"  wrote in message   
   >> news:hlwdjsd2-08852C.17293125052013@news.giganews.com...   
   >>> In article   
   >>> ,   
   >>> Jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> In article , "SaPeIsMa"   
   >>>>    
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> > "Jeanne Douglas"  wrote in message   
   >>>> > news:hlwdjsd2-E96C05.22033024052013@news.giganews.com...   
   >>>> > > In article   
   >>>> > > ,   
   >>>> > > Jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:   
   >>>> > >   
   >>>> > >   
   >>>> > >> It's possible that Cindy Thomas (IRS supervisor) was following   
   >>>> > >> instructions she received from her bosses in the White House.   
   >>>> Read > >> this:   
   >>>> > >>   
   >>>> > >> I read one report indicating that some liberal democrat members of   
   >>>> > >> Congress that were upset about tea party group's influence told   
   >>>> > >> Obama   
   >>>> > >> and   
   >>>> > >> his top aides that they should send the IRS after the tea party   
   >>>> > >> groups.   
   >>>> > >> That leads me to believe that it is possible that the IRS > >>   
   >>>> supervisors   
   >>>> > >> such   
   >>>> > >> as Cindy Thomas were following orders passed down from their   
   >>>> bosses > >> in   
   >>>> > >> the   
   >>>> > >> White House.   
   >>>> > >   
   >>>> > > Why would she obey illegal orders.   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> > Because she's a good little ideological drone ?   
   >>>> > Because she doesn't have the brass to refuse ?   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> > >   
   >>>> > > And remember that the President has no power over   
   >>>> > > non-politically-appointed workers.   
   >>>> > >   
   >>>> >   
   >>>> > The President has all kinds of power, both direct and indirect.   
   >>>> > Hell, the promise that she would be taken care of and protected if   
   >>>> > things   
   >>>> > blow up would be good enough...   
   >>>> > One woman got to become a US Supreme Court Justice for all the work   
   >>>> she > did   
   >>>> > to help push through Obamacare.   
   >>>> > And she didn't even have the decency to recuse herself when the   
   >>>> case > came   
   >>>> > to   
   >>>> > the Supreme Court.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I worked for a state agency before I retired. I worked with some   
   >>>> employees   
   >>>> just like Cindy Thomas. They would do whatever the boss told them to do   
   >>>> (even if it was a violation of the rules). They knew that was the   
   >>>> best way   
   >>>> to get promotions. They were correct. Many of them got the promotions   
   >>>> they   
   >>>> were seeking since the top bosses knew they would obey their orders   
   >>>> even   
   >>>> if the orders were in violation of the rules or laws. We called them   
   >>>> ass   
   >>>> kissers and lap dogs.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It worked out for the lady that Obama appointed to the supreme court.   
   >>>   
   >>> What? What the fuck are you talking about?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> You really are this ignorant ??   
   >> Let me repeat the clues for the clueless   
   >>     ++ One woman got to become a US Supreme Court Justice   
   >>     ++ for all the work she did  to help push through Obamacare.   
   >>     ++ And she didn't even have the decency to recuse herself   
   >>     ++ when the case came to the Supreme Court.   
   >>   
   >> I'll give you another clue, because you are so stump-ignorant   
   >>     Her name starts with a "K"..   
   >>   
   >   
   > So you are pissing and moaning about something Scalia and Thomas do? ?> >   
   >  > Why?   
      
   What are you babbling about now ?   
   What are you claiming that Scalia and Thomas do ?   
      
   Unlike Kagan. NEITHER worked on pushing Obamacare through   
       Clearly the notion of Conflict of Interest is beyond you   
      
   You're such an imbecilic troll, you should  yourself.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca