XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: kiltmac@gmail.com   
      
   On 5/29/2013 9:25 AM, SaPeIsMa wrote:   
   > "Tom McDonald"  wrote in message   
   > news:_bnpt.15217$uT3.13086@newsfe20.iad...   
   >> On 5/29/2013 7:36 AM, SaPeIsMa wrote:   
   >>> "Tom McDonald"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:%bept.42659$9X5.15117@newsfe31.iad...   
   >>>> On 5/28/2013 9:53 PM, SaPeIsMa wrote:   
   >>>>> "Jeanne Douglas"  wrote in message   
   >>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-08852C.17293125052013@news.giganews.com...   
   >>>>>> In article   
   >>>>>> ,   
   >>>>>> Jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> In article , "SaPeIsMa"   
   >>>>>>>    
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> > "Jeanne Douglas"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>> > news:hlwdjsd2-E96C05.22033024052013@news.giganews.com...   
   >>>>>>> > > In article   
   >>>>>>> > > ,   
   >>>>>>> > > Jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:   
   >>>>>>> > >   
   >>>>>>> > >   
   >>>>>>> > >> It's possible that Cindy Thomas (IRS supervisor) was following   
   >>>>>>> > >> instructions she received from her bosses in the White House.   
   >>>>>>> Read > >> this:   
   >>>>>>> > >>   
   >>>>>>> > >> I read one report indicating that some liberal democrat   
   >>>>>>> members of   
   >>>>>>> > >> Congress that were upset about tea party group's influence told   
   >>>>>>> > >> Obama   
   >>>>>>> > >> and   
   >>>>>>> > >> his top aides that they should send the IRS after the tea party   
   >>>>>>> > >> groups.   
   >>>>>>> > >> That leads me to believe that it is possible that the IRS > >>   
   >>>>>>> supervisors   
   >>>>>>> > >> such   
   >>>>>>> > >> as Cindy Thomas were following orders passed down from their   
   >>>>>>> bosses > >> in   
   >>>>>>> > >> the   
   >>>>>>> > >> White House.   
   >>>>>>> > >   
   >>>>>>> > > Why would she obey illegal orders.   
   >>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>> > Because she's a good little ideological drone ?   
   >>>>>>> > Because she doesn't have the brass to refuse ?   
   >>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>> > >   
   >>>>>>> > > And remember that the President has no power over   
   >>>>>>> > > non-politically-appointed workers.   
   >>>>>>> > >   
   >>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>> > The President has all kinds of power, both direct and indirect.   
   >>>>>>> > Hell, the promise that she would be taken care of and protected if   
   >>>>>>> > things   
   >>>>>>> > blow up would be good enough...   
   >>>>>>> > One woman got to become a US Supreme Court Justice for all the   
   >>>>>>> work   
   >>>>>>> she > did   
   >>>>>>> > to help push through Obamacare.   
   >>>>>>> > And she didn't even have the decency to recuse herself when the   
   >>>>>>> case > came   
   >>>>>>> > to   
   >>>>>>> > the Supreme Court.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I worked for a state agency before I retired. I worked with some   
   >>>>>>> employees   
   >>>>>>> just like Cindy Thomas. They would do whatever the boss told them   
   >>>>>>> to do   
   >>>>>>> (even if it was a violation of the rules). They knew that was the   
   >>>>>>> best way   
   >>>>>>> to get promotions. They were correct. Many of them got the   
   >>>>>>> promotions   
   >>>>>>> they   
   >>>>>>> were seeking since the top bosses knew they would obey their orders   
   >>>>>>> even   
   >>>>>>> if the orders were in violation of the rules or laws. We called   
   >>>>>>> them ass   
   >>>>>>> kissers and lap dogs.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> It worked out for the lady that Obama appointed to the supreme   
   >>>>>>> court.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> What? What the fuck are you talking about?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> You really are this ignorant ??   
   >>>>> Let me repeat the clues for the clueless   
   >>>>>     ++ One woman got to become a US Supreme Court Justice   
   >>>>>     ++ for all the work she did  to help push through Obamacare.   
   >>>>>     ++ And she didn't even have the decency to recuse herself   
   >>>>>     ++ when the case came to the Supreme Court.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I'll give you another clue, because you are so stump-ignorant   
   >>>>>     Her name starts with a "K"..   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> So you are pissing and moaning about something Scalia and Thomas do?   
   >>>> ?> >  > Why?   
   >>>   
   >>> What are you babbling about now ?   
   >>> What are you claiming that Scalia and Thomas do ?   
   >>   
   >>  They didn't recuse themselves from cases in which they had a   
   >> conflict of interest. I thought that was fairly clear. Apparently you   
   >> need things spoon-fed you.   
   >>   
   >   
   > What cases where those ?   
   > You're making the claims, YOU PROVE your claim   
      
   Start with Bush v Gore.   
      
   > Apparently you imagine that just by making statements, we should   
   > automatically accept them at face value   
   > Considering you have lied in the past, that won't happen soon.   
   >   
   >   
   >>> Unlike Kagan. NEITHER worked on pushing Obamacare through   
   >>>     Clearly the notion of Conflict of Interest is beyond you   
   >>>   
   >>> You're such an imbecilic troll, you should  yourself.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)