XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   From: SaPeIsMa@gmail.com   
      
   "Free Lunch"  wrote in message   
   news:i74cq8tkc9j3ge7fhaab949dnv3bimi0ts@4ax.com...   
   > On Wed, 29 May 2013 07:38:21 -0500, "SaPeIsMa"    
   > wrote in alt.atheism:   
   >   
   >>"Free Lunch"  wrote in message   
   >>news:csraq81970ul3ohpb0a4mfhb3eq3ht6mai@4ax.com...   
   >>> On Tue, 28 May 2013 21:53:35 -0500, "SaPeIsMa"    
   >>> wrote in alt.atheism:   
   >>>   
   >>>>"Jeanne Douglas"  wrote in message   
   >>>>news:hlwdjsd2-08852C.17293125052013@news.giganews.com...   
   >>>>> In article   
   >>>>> ,   
   >>>>> Jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:   
   > ....   
   >>>>>> I worked for a state agency before I retired. I worked with some   
   >>>>>> employees   
   >>>>>> just like Cindy Thomas. They would do whatever the boss told them to   
   >>>>>> do   
   >>>>>> (even if it was a violation of the rules). They knew that was the   
   >>>>>> best way   
   >>>>>> to get promotions. They were correct. Many of them got the promotions   
   >>>>>> they   
   >>>>>> were seeking since the top bosses knew they would obey their orders   
   >>>>>> even   
   >>>>>> if the orders were in violation of the rules or laws. We called them   
   >>>>>> ass   
   >>>>>> kissers and lap dogs.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> It worked out for the lady that Obama appointed to the supreme court.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> What? What the fuck are you talking about?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>You really are this ignorant ??   
   >>>>Let me repeat the clues for the clueless   
   >>>>    ++ One woman got to become a US Supreme Court Justice   
   >>>>    ++ for all the work she did  to help push through Obamacare.   
   >>>>    ++ And she didn't even have the decency to recuse herself   
   >>>>    ++ when the case came to the Supreme Court.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>I'll give you another clue, because you are so stump-ignorant   
   >>>>    Her name starts with a "K"..   
   >>>   
   >>> You need to stop lying to us.   
   >>   
   >>Where is the lie, dummy ?   
   >>    Or are you just trying to prove (again) how stupid and ignorant you   
   >> are   
   >>?   
   > You have falsely claimed that Justic Kagan did not recuse herself on a   
   > case where that is the ethical thing to do. It seems unlikely that she   
   > had anything to do with it given that the law had only been passed   
   > shortly before she was nominated to the Court.   
   >   
      
   I'm so sorry you are so stump ignorant and therefore presume that those who   
   know more than you are lying   
   Before her nomination to the Supreme Court, Justice Kagan was responsible   
   for ushering Obamacare   
   She was Solicitor-general and she assigned a deputy to help prepare legal   
   defenses to any challenges to ObamaCare.   
      
   Read more:   
          
      
      
   > Do you have actual evidence or merely the bigoted innuendo that   
   > ignorant, hate-filled reactionaries spew?   
      
   Yes, I do   
   And the only one spewing the bigoted ignorant hate-filled reactionary spew   
   is you   
         
      
   Why do you like getting bitch-slapped with such regularity   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)