XPost: alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns
From: kiltmac@gmail.com
On 5/29/2013 2:09 PM, RD Sandman wrote:
> "SaPeIsMa" wrote in
> news:ko3psm$n3a$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> "Tom McDonald" wrote in message
>> news:Z4uot.26866$CG1.14761@newsfe21.iad...
>>> On 5/26/2013 12:52 PM, SaPeIsMa wrote:
>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" wrote in message
>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-08852C.17293125052013@news.giganews.com...
>>>>> In article
>>>>> ,
>>>>> Jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article , "SaPeIsMa"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Jeanne Douglas" wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:hlwdjsd2-E96C05.22033024052013@news.giganews.com...
>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>> ,
>>>>>>>> Jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's possible that Cindy Thomas (IRS supervisor) was
>>>>>>>>> following instructions she received from her bosses in the
>>>>>>>>> White House.
>>>>>> Read > >> this:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I read one report indicating that some liberal democrat
>>>>>>>>> members of Congress that were upset about tea party group's
>>>>>>>>> influence told Obama
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> his top aides that they should send the IRS after the tea
>>>>>>>>> party groups.
>>>>>>>>> That leads me to believe that it is possible that the IRS >
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> supervisors
>>>>>>>>> such
>>>>>>>>> as Cindy Thomas were following orders passed down from their
>>>>>> bosses > >> in
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> White House.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why would she obey illegal orders.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because she's a good little ideological drone ?
>>>>>>> Because she doesn't have the brass to refuse ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And remember that the President has no power over
>>>>>>>> non-politically-appointed workers.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The President has all kinds of power, both direct and indirect.
>>>>>>> Hell, the promise that she would be taken care of and protected
>>>>>>> if things
>>>>>>> blow up would be good enough...
>>>>>>> One woman got to become a US Supreme Court Justice for all the
>>>>>>> work
>>>>>> she > did
>>>>>>> to help push through Obamacare.
>>>>>>> And she didn't even have the decency to recuse herself when the
>>>>>> case > came
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> the Supreme Court.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I worked for a state agency before I retired. I worked with some
>>>>>> employees
>>>>>> just like Cindy Thomas. They would do whatever the boss told them
>>>>>> to do (even if it was a violation of the rules). They knew that
>>>>>> was the best way
>>>>>> to get promotions. They were correct. Many of them got the
>>>>>> promotions they
>>>>>> were seeking since the top bosses knew they would obey their
>>>>>> orders even
>>>>>> if the orders were in violation of the rules or laws. We called
>>>>>> them ass
>>>>>> kissers and lap dogs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It worked out for the lady that Obama appointed to the supreme
>>>>>> court.
>>>>>
>>>>> What? What the fuck are you talking about?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah
>>>> The one who didn't recuse herself as se should have when the
>>>> Constitutionality of the law she helped create and push through came
>>>> under review.
>>>>
>>> Would that be Scalia or Thomas?
>>
>>
>> Poor baby, can't even read for comprehension
>> What do you think the word "herself" implicits, dummy ?
>> And neither Scalia nor Thomas were put on the Bench by Obama
>
> Nor are either one a "she".
>
>> Come back when you actually know something
>>
>>
>
>
>
You know, I know that. I was referring to the issue of justices not
recusing themselves when they had a conflict of interest. Looks like I
needed to be more clear.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
